The Pros And Cons Of Gridlocks

1336 Words3 Pages

Presidents are elected by popular vote while prime ministers are elected by parliament. Furthermore, presidents are in charge of all people in the country where they were elected while prime ministers are in charge of the parliament. Presidents serve in four year terms with a maximum of two terms while prime ministers serve for as long as the coalition which he or she is part of remains or as long as the party he or she is a part of has the majority number of seats. In countries with parliamentary systems, voters elect members of parliament but not the prime minister. Most northern and southern American countries have presidents while many Western European countries have prime ministers. What factors contribute to gridlock? Describe. Gridlock occurs when members of rival political parties control different areas of government thus resulting in the government’s lack of ability to function. Many Americans claim gridlock results from a divided government. However, whether or not a divided government contributes to gridlock more than a unified government is a hotly debated question which does not have a clear answer. Unified governments results when many people from the same ideological wing of a …show more content…

The Budget Act of 1974 resulted after Nixon wanted to decrease the budget of the United States in 1972 to $250 billion, which congress refused to do. As a result, Nixon pocket vetoed many other spending vetoes which resulted in congress passing the Budget Act of 1974. A negative side effect of the Budget Act of 1974 is that even if one branch of government doesn’t need all the money they are allocated a certain year, they spend it all anyways because they don’t want to risk congress decreasing their budget for next year when they might need all of the

Open Document