The Pros And Cons Of Franklin Delano Roosevelt

1911 Words4 Pages

When the Constitution was first written by America’s founding fathers, they intended for the executive branch to serve the nation’s citizenry by keeping their best interests at heart, but stated that in no way should this branch be more powerful than any other—it be constantly checked and balanced by the legislative and judicial branches.. In James Madison’s Federalist Number 48, he states that in a representative republic, “the executive magistracy is carefully limited; both in the extent and the duration of its power” (Federalist #48). The founding fathers never intended for the role of President of the United States of America to become ‘imperialistic’, meaning that the government takes too much control, and is too involved in the affairs of the
FDR believed in a “New Deal” America, containing social welfare and unemployment, Medicare, government involvement within the economy to help regulate and set standards. Both of these presidencies changed the fabric of American society by bringing the country as a whole through incredibly difficult issues, and showing how, with government intervention, the economy can be brought back up even through the toughest of times. For example, it was primarily because of FDR’s CCC plan that millions of men received jobs during the Great Depression, and millions were able to keep those jobs as maintenance for the infrastructure built. Harry Truman, inaugurated April 12, 1945, also pushed the power executive branch, but during a time of social and political crisis, rather than a financial

Open Document