The Pros And Cons Of Fox News

1209 Words3 Pages

Before I am completely encapsulated with my emotions (mostly craze) I would like to make two statements whilst my mind remains somewhat stable… somewhat. The first being that several hundred news websites have published their own versions of this article; however, I chose to write about Fox News’ version. The second statement I am going to make is as follows. Fox news is the bane of my entire existence. Thank you. I’m going to refer to the world’s richest 62 as “greed” and Fox News as “ambition”. Greed and ambition eat at the same table. They both devour their meal; the delicious lower class. Fox news is right wing garbage. They are highly subjective and you would do yourself better by not watching the news entirely as opposed to watching …show more content…

The average value of these 62 is over 40 billion dollars. Multiply that by 62 and you get 2.54e+12. Honestly I don’t know what that means but we’ll stick with saying it’s an egregious sum of money. Now why this article and the statistics as a whole are so upsetting to me is due to the power of implication and overall lack of interest in wealth distribution. The reason everyone, especially Fox News is brushing this off is because the entire idea of a functioning capitalist system and the rights of the wealthiest individuals would collapse if anyone acted upon this uneven distribution. If you forcibly took the money from these rich people and redistributed it, what's going to come next? Why not take from the next richest 100 to even further close the gap? Why not just flatten out all inequality? The core of the entire economy of the horrendous corporate/capitalistic society we live in would be destroyed due to the implication that our money, sovereignty of self and assets isn’t safe. This in turn leads us full circle. Likely, all the wealthy people and their businesses would move overseas immediately, and the financial system would grind to a halt as people battled over the right to property and government interference. The capital markets wouldn't work, as intrinsic value means nothing when it can be stripped away without reason. Innovation would slow to a crawl as …show more content…

A state doesn’t wage war for humanitarian reasons; the single purpose of any war is to placate the hysterical appetite for new income and to appease supporters of the state. Though, world powers continue to weep over humanitarian crises They can’t seem to figure out why so many people are dying of hunger, diseases etc. in these war ravaged countries. Actually, its not that they can’t figure it out, its more that in dealing with the root of the problem, they would indirectly be taking responsibility for the deaths involved, the wealth gap and the fact that they are being bought off while simultaneously cutting into their own green filled pockets. Authority and dispensation are being used to rig the structure to continue the slit between the richest and the rest of us to planes that have not been seen before. Wealth is being pulled upwards at an alarming rate and the importance of the lower class becomes less and less each day as the value of money increases. Greed is unmanageable without money; all other kinds of accretion and of mania for it appear as nascent. Greed though, is centered on those little green rectangles that allow one to rule the

Open Document