Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Profit maximization and its arguments
Profit maximisation theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Profit maximization and its arguments
Today, it is generally perceived by the public that the single and sole objective of corporations is to maximize profits (Bartlett, 2015), reflected in President Bill Clinton’s radio address in 1996 during which he stated “the most fundamental responsibility for any business is to make a profit”. This belief could be substantiated by the statistic that the profit margins of American corporations have risen from the 1980s to 2008 (Blodget, 2012), shown by the increase in nominal GDP of the United States over the period (Yardeni, Johnson, 2016). Given the above, it could be deduced that most businesses do indeed have a single objective of profit maximization and therefore tend to pursue short-term gains at the expense of all other considerations. …show more content…
This is elaborated in The Corporation, where Joel Baken (2005, p.56) suggests that corporations are evil and pathological institutions due to the fact that managers are inherently righteous people with good intentions but, when in the context of business, will act in what would otherwise be deemed outside of their private lives in a psychopathic …show more content…
The term, in other words, point out that capitalism could be a key driver for both social and economic good (Schwartz, 2013). Corporations practicing conscious capitalism are stakeholder-oriented, led by “values-based leaders” who come across more as a servant than a celebrity, and, although they do continue to view profitability as necessary and desirable, do not pursue these short-term gains at the expense of all other considerations (O’Toole, Vogel, 2011). An example of this in practice would be Container Store who pays their full-time sales employees nearly twice as much the industry average (Schwartz,
The terms “conscious” and “capitalism” are seldom used together; however, John Mackey, the Co-CEO of Whole Foods Market, has started a movement known as Conscious Capitalism that has the power to change the way businesses operate. For years, many vilify businesses due to their reputation of merciless methods of earning profits. In fact, the Merriam Webster dictionary defines capitalism as, “an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit”. Mackey introduces a new concept and meaning for businesses in his book Conscious Capitalism: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business stating that there is a higher purpose for companies than generating profit. Higher purpose, conscious leadership, conscious culture, and stakeholder orientation are the four key tenants of practice to becoming a conscious capitalist company. After attending the trips on the Dallas Study Tour, I was able to witness how various companies operated and how their cultures were aligned with conscious capitalism.
Definitions: Capitalism: a way of organizing an economy so that the things that are used to make and transport products are owned by individual people and companies rather than by the government “http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism” Economic: of, relating to, or based on the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services “http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/economic” Just: Based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair “http://www.oxforddiction Reason 1: In Capitalism, man is an end in himself, not a slave to society. “Man—every man—is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others; he must live for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself; he must work for his rational self-interest, with the achievement of his own happiness as the highest moral purpose of his life.”- Ayn Rand In Capitalism, the individual is sovereign. Reason 2: In Capitalism, there is freedom to act freely.
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.
The first set of definitions included internal business strategies focused on satisfying primary stakeholders along with the needs of the organization. Creating shareholder wealth, growth, satisfying customers with quality products and job creation are mentioned in this first set of responsibilities. Novak refers to “the defeat of envy through upward mobility” (Jennings, 2009) which basically is saying that promotion within the workplace gives people a reason to continue working hard because they will be rewarded. Reward is the basic premise for employment in a capitalistic culture. Because there are few or scarce resources, people will be rewarded according to how hard they work, and how well they work. According to a secondary source Capitalism Crib-Sheet, (Anxiety Culture.com, n.d.) who quotes from the Wealth of the Nations by Smith, “By rewarding the most efficient, competitive people, efficiency and competition are promoted, and everyone benefits more than if inefficiency was rewarded.” (Smith, 1776)
Moral capitalism can most easily be defined as these corporations; these larger than life entities practice some sort of human quality. This quality is what we as humans consider “moral”. Depending on who you ask these morals vary, but for the most part it means giving back to the community that fuels you. For example if you poison the river by the factory and kill all the towns’ people, you have no one to work in the factory anymore. Given this very basic example I believe that more and more companies should look into adopting forms of this practice. Obviously these fortune 500 companies have one goal in mind, that is to make money, but this doesn’t mean it can’t do things for the workers and the community that it exists in. Look at Jeff Swartz
Communism is often seen as something bad and that should be avoided and completely banish in every country. But what people think about communism is often stereotypes and ideas that are not always true. Communism is that everybody is equal in the country, that everybody only gets what they need and nothing more. In a communist society, there are no class divisions, meaning that the people are neither poor or rich, because everybody lives equally.Communist nations make sure that even the poorest will always have food on their tables, get quality education and have access to basic healthcare. When it comes to employment, communism promises jobs for everybody, where they get access to equal opportunities. The hire-and-fire system that is common
The economic model states that the only goal of businesses is to maximize profits for the shareholders. The business is not equipped to work with social activities, and they limit its ability to be competitive in a global marketplace. The argument against CSR is that it questions the profit maximization for businesses. Critics argue that CSR distracts businesses from their economic role. Milton Friedman argued that markets should work on their own, and CSR makes markets not sufficient enough and as a result good competition suffers. One of the examples is Walmart and their low prices strategies. The company is aggressive with its suppliers, competitors, and even local municipalities when negotiating tax and financial incentives. These strategies help company maintain their low prices, and therefore satisfy customers. The company has been committed to obeying the law in all of its strategies, and they have been maximizing the shareholders profits within the law. According to Friedman, this company would be socially responsible corporation. Its corporate strategy has achieved several ethical objectives. Society benefits when the company offers a range of products with low prices, the company outsources its services to the most efficient supplier, and attracts more investors. Overall, society benefits from the company’s profit
Corporate governance has undergone tremendous growth in the last decade. Many countries have pronounced corporate governance codes with exemplifies good corporate governance. This recommendations are geared towards achieving transparency and accountability. U.S and U.K views corporate governance solely from the perspective of wealth maximization for shareholders. On the other hand Japanese companies and some other countries has gone further to give corporate governance a broader definition which includes employees, customers, suppliers and shareholders satisfaction.
Privatisation means transferring the control of an enterprise from the government sector to the private sector. Generally, but not always, this also means transferring ownership of the Public sector enterprise as well as control.
The problem that was investigated consisted of a question that Milton Friedman posed in one of his articles, which was featured in The New York Times Magazine in 1970. The question was, “What does it mean to say that “business” has responsibilities” (Friedman, 2007, p. 173)? Friedman (1970) elaborated on how businesses cannot have assigned responsibilities. Furthermore, he described how groups or individuals should be the only ones that can hold responsibilities, not businesses. He stated that associating responsibilities with the word business is too ambiguous. I will examine three discussion questions and three compare and contrast questions which Jennings (2009) posed in a case study that is related to Friedman’s (1970) article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”.
Capitalism is an economic system in which the production and distribution are privately owned, the government involvement is minimal,and there is free enterprise. In Capitalism, the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit in a competitive market. Also the economic investment, ownership and profits are all owned by individuals. Under capitalism the state is separated from the economy, which means that the government has no role in business. In other words, everyone works for themselves. The market forces in a capitalist country runs by supply and demand which it determines the price and later on it turns into profits. Supply is the quantity of goods and services a business is willing to sell, while Demand is the quantity of goods and services consumers are willing to buy. Therefore, Capitalism is the best economic system because it rewards the ones that work hard and since the government does not control trade, there is a large variety of goods and creates options for consumers to fit their personal needs.
CSR also encourages the fame of the business enterprises. Ot is a certain that activities which are related to CSR has more priority in the creation of various forms of fame value and reputation of the company which was dissimilar to customers. It was through the pesrception of customers towards these value that can arbitrate the relationship between a company’s CSR activities and its succeeding presentation in finals.
In order to stay competitive in the global market, Multinational corporations have continued to expand into newer markets. Being responsible and maintaining good relationships with host countries is vital to their success. Multinational Corporations have increased over the years but there are plenty of hurdles to overcome in terms of properly executing their strategy. Political relations between countries where MNCs operate should be stable to avoid problems with production, design and employee turnover. What’s important to keep in mind is that a Multinational corporation cannot be successful if they try to implement new ideas or products without proper research in the market where their products are being made. If a MRC in the U.S is doing business in Japan but tries to create a new technological product for Japan it would be wise to consult with engineers in Japan who are familiar with local trends and knowledge of the market before going ahead with production. That should be considered common sense but there are instances where products are pushed to a market with very little success because the proper research was not done. MRCs need to be more innovative so that they remain competitive in an always-changing global market.
... of some threat they pose to mans survival cannot be justified. The historical record of the corporations in America indicates that the opposite is true. The positive changes that businesses have made on society are enormous. The common good has been well served by the decisions of many corporate leaders, and one might even consider their action to be almost heroic in nature. The reality is that regardless of the long-term benefits to their communities, the choices made by leaders in business have been, and must continue to be, motivated by profit, and profit alone.