The Pros And Cons Of Cognitive Behavior Therapy

1075 Words3 Pages

In the 1960’s, Dr. Aaron Beck developed a new approach to treating depression called Cognitive therapy, which is now called Cognitive-behavioral therapy. “Cognitive-behavioral therapy is an empirically validated form of psychotherapy that has been shown to be effective in over 350 outcome studies and myriad psychiatric disorders” (Bieling, 2006). There are a number of rationales why Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can support clients with substance use problems. CBT is time-limited, works in the present (rather than issues from the past) and helps people problem-solve and learn new skills that can be used in their everyday lives. Another reason for using CBT with clients with substance use problems is that they learn to identify their …show more content…

This in turn can be a significant cost saving for the health care system, as well, delivering a proven treatment to more people with positive results (Bieling, 2006). CBT is an effective treatment for people with co-occurring disorders, that it, substance abuse and a mental health diagnosis, for example alcohol addiction with depression. In this scenario a client can be educated about their depression and its relationship with alcohol. Each of the components of CBT can ripple through the mental health and addiction at the same time (Rotges & Nguyen, 2006). CBT can offer support with individuals who, “May initially have difficulty in their behavior change, or who may be slower to pick up and utilize new skills effectively” (Rotges & Nguyen, 2006). The group empowers people the ability to help each other, as the group becomes each member’s community during their time together working through the various parts of the CBT program. If and when a member gets into difficulty members of the group can step in, help as well model new behaviors (Rotges & Nguyen, …show more content…

The screening process will determine if the client will benefit from cognitive behavior therapy, will identify contributing members and will eliminate individuals who may not be suitable for the treatment. There are some factors to consider in the screening process and the first is motivation for treatment. Exploring with the member internal and external motivational factors for change can be done at the screening process as well as, possible barriers for example, reading, writing or comprehension. This barrier would not exclude people from the group it would only be a indictor that the person may need additional support during group sessions. The screening process would also be a time to identify issues such as mental health or if the person is being mandated to attend a group. One last issue I would explore with the person is prior treatments, to identify what worked and what did not work in prior sessions and groups. Screening also provides the facilitator to discuss confidentiality and to answer questions and to alleviate potential anxiety about the group. Screening is as important as the material covered in the group sessions and is as important as the last stage which is

Open Document