America. The land of opportunities and dreams. Where people simply gets only the best quality and nothing less. After all it is America. The only problem is, this is all a illusion. A illusion that covers up the fact that America has fallen off top ten on the Education Ranking Chart and hit its all time low. This should not be a surprise to many considering the American education system is as broken as its politics. So how can we as a nation help rebuild our education system and make it great again? Simple. Push schools to start later and provide smaller classrooms. Even though having school starting later will cause delayment in afterschool activities and having smaller classrooms might cost more money, the overall benefit of children improvement …show more content…
Since around 40% of the American school starts at 8:00am, it mean that students must wake up for school before the sun even rises. This disturbs students biological clock which is a molecular mechanism that directs periodic gene expression and cellular activity(Campbell), in other words our body's way of telling us that the sleep cycle occurs when the surrounding environment is dark and awake when it is light. Thus revealing that since school starts really early, adolescents go against their human nature, just to get to school on time. On top of that, sleep experts recommends that teenagers should get at least nine hours of sleep per night but with the abundant amount of homework and early school start time, the possibility of nine hour is slim. Today, nearly two out of three students manage to get just under eight hours of sleep while two out of five obtain under six hours of sleep (Start School Later). With the lack of sleep, it is only natural that majority of students constantly feel sleep deprived and that can lead to different mental heath issues such as depression and anxiety.. According to a non …show more content…
With around 50 million childrens in the U.S and a small budget of approximately 69 billion, it is difficult to spend a large chunk of the finances on smaller classroom sizes when their are many other pressing issues regarding education. It is even argue that “Reducing class size is widely considered one of the most expensive education reform measures a state can take. legislators and other policymakers will likely need to be convinced the additional funds they could spend in other ways will be worth the cost”(CSG). Although it is true that it is extremely costly and challenging to be able to install smaller classroom sizes all across the nation, especially sinces there's no guarantee that smaller classroom sizes is as effective as it seems, in the long run there are more students succeeding compare to a larger class size which indicates that smaller classroom sizes help improve education quality overall. For instances, “Health and Education Research Operative Services, found that when compared to average-sized classes, students in smaller classes in the early years eventually take more advanced courses in high school and are more likely to graduate in the top 10 percent of their class” illustrates that by investing into smaller classrooms, students in the future are able to continue their success academically from all the benefits gain
America now knows where they stand on the totem pole regarding education. Having a powerful military and democratic government will only get Americans so far as being a world leader. Teaching American students rigorously will increase America’s dominance as a country and as a people for generations. Teachers are an essential need in America. The United States often takes teachers for granted and if the U.S. government helps educators by improving the quality of their teaching, students will succeed in the classroom. America can perhaps no longer be a country with a zombie-like attitude, but a country thriving with accomplished students supported by the community around them.
Chris Hedges, the author of the article “Why the United States is Destroying Its Education System” attempts to persuade his audience to agree with his argument through the use of rhetoric. In this text critique, I will thoroughly analyze the effectiveness of his article by highlighting important premises, tropes, ideographs, and narratives. He claims that the United States’ education system is on a downward spiral due to education reform and the influence of corporate power.
America’s public school system started off very rough, but through the dedication of many hard-working Americans, it was starting to shape into a system that allowed all children, regardless of race, gender, religion, or nation of origin, to have an education.
The greatest country in the world still has problems evenly distributing education to its youth. The articles I have read for this unit have a common theme regarding our education system. The authors illustrate to the reader about the struggles in America concerning how we obtain and education. Oppression, politics, racism, and socioeconomic status are a few examples of what is wrong with our country and its means of delivering a fair education to all Americans.
Something I have always known since I was a little kid is that the educational system in this country is a complete fraud. American schools claim to live by the ideal of No Child Left Behind, but millions of students get cast aside each and every year. In schools these days, it is obvious which students are the elite—those that are raised up and motivated to go to college—and the ordinary student— those that are somewhat ignored throughout their schooling and are lucky if they even earn a GED. As a recent graduate of high school, and a product of this country’s educational system, I have had the opportunity to develop my own opinions regarding the myth of education in our society. Based upon my observations going through the school system, and the various arguments posed by several authors in “Rereading America”, I strongly believe that schooling in this society caters solely to students in the elite category while ostracizing students that do not live up to the elitist ideal.
Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, the American educational system has undergone much transition in response to our changing society. Though there have been many problems raised throughout the years in regard to what our school systems should be teaching our children, there have also been many developments.
Julian Nava was one of the people who fought to end IQ testing. He believed that students that did not get high IQ scores still had the potential to be something greater than a factory worker.
The correlation between the amount of students in a class and the overall achievement of students has been a highly controversial topic for some time now. Many people have been wondering if smaller class sizes really do help students perform better in school or not. I personally do better when I am in smaller classes and have better focus on the topic at hand. According to Jacqui Murray, teacher of 15 years and writer for Teachers Hub, things like class size, along with other things like per-pupil expenditure and percentage of teachers with advanced degrees, does not matter as much as we think it does. What does matter, according to a study talked about in her article "Bigger Can Be Better: Reasons Class Size
School funding has always been a debatable topic. Although school funding needs to be increased, there is no proof of academic achievement (Hanushek). Academic researchers have sought to answer the questions of whether education expenditures are correlated with student performance(Hanushek). Hanushek has found that there is no proof of academic achievement towards funding the schools(Hanushek). It depends on how the money is spent, not on how much money is spent(Hanushek). “ There are so many areas of education that require money(Shanker).” When you are able to reduce the size of a classroom you allow the teacher the opportunity to give additional help by spending more time with each individual student(Shanker). Also, higher teacher salaries are very important when it comes to having the best teachers(Shanker). Studies show that raising the city’s basic per-pupil allocation from $9,306 to $11,608 will provide better technology and better teachers(Brown). Smaller classroom size and better teachers have a positive effect ...
Districts have to think about if it is worth the money to reduce class sizes, and if there is enough proof that students are academically better off in smaller class size rather than larger classes. According to Matthew Chingos and Grover Whitehurt authors of Class Size: What Research Says and What It Means for State Policy, “Increasing the pupil/teacher ratio in the U.S. by one student would save at least $12 billion per year in teacher salary cost alone” (Chingos, Whitehurt). Why would districts want to pay for the creation of smaller classes when they could save more by just adding more students to a class? This goes to show that there should not be a price tag on someone’s education. Why put more on a teacher’s plate just to save money? With the result from the Student Teacher Ratio, it is hard for districts to say that having smaller class sizes is not the way to spend money. If the districts spent the money on the class size reduction, they would not have to worry about an annual cost, because once small classes are set in place, the districts do not have to continue to pay. According to the National Education Association (NEA), having class size reductions do not only involve money but also create “improved health, less Medicaid coverage, lower crime rates, and fewer welfare recipients” (Class Size Reduction: A Proven Strategy). So, the districts should also look at this before being concerned to where their money goes. The district’s money, according to the NEA, is going into these students who will live a better life later on when they are out of school and into the real
... Class size reduction is another area that would enable our school system to move forward. In a smaller size classroom, educational quality will be improved. Teachers have greater amount of time to build a solid ground for the students to flourish. Though changes need to take place in our current school system, I am thankful to be in a country where my children have the right to be educated.
The class room sizes in schools today are very cramped and over populated. Teachers have more students than they can teach, making it hard to give any kind of one on one attention. There is an increased need for educational professionals, all teaching fields are experiencing a need for more teachers, and each type of educator possesses different teaching skills, and are on different ends of the pay scale depending on their teaching specialty.
their ideas, "without this they will not really be able to think or believe in
If class sizes where smaller, teachers would be able to do more hands on activities and there would be less chance for distractions. Even through, teachers would be able to do more hands on activities and there would be less chance for distraction. Teachers could do more hands-on activities in a science class likesuch as experiments in class instead of homework outside of class. In smaller class sizes there would be less chance for distractions, more time to review for a big test, there would be more interaction with the teacher.. “In elementary schools, class sizes generally hovered around 20 in 2008, rising to 25 to 30 in many cases this year.” (Giuliani, 1)There would be more time to review for a big test in a smaller class. There would be more interaction with the teacher in a smaller class size. According to Scott Thill “The proposal by billionaire Bill Gates to increase cl...
There has been a lot of controversy lately about how a decrease in the number of kids in the classrooms and could change how well a child performs in his/her schoolwork. Many researchers believe that a small class size will have a positive effect on class achievement, but other researchers have found that reducing class size has no advantage at all. For example, Ivor Pritchard from the National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum and Assessment says “reducing class size will increase costs without producing substantial benefits”(1999). From this example, it can be seen that there have been many sources that say small class size does affect the child, but only the results of class size research will determine what kinds of effects class size has on students. The purpose of this research paper is to examine how small class size affects the child and his achievements in the classroom.