The Power of Evil in Hamlet

846 Words2 Pages

In William Shakespeare play Hamlet, Hamlet mutually represents both the hero of the story and the main character. Since the existence of literature and cinema there have been instances when the protagonist of the piece sets his primary goal to get rid of an evil character, or villain. A reader might wonder how the hero might accomplish such a task. One way this is achieved is by entirely erasing the evil in that character or the character himself. A different approach is by vigilantly preparing the event for the prefect chance to strike while he himself ironically becomes consumed by evil. The wickedness is much like a disease that strikes. It is possible for evil to originate in one character and later infect another; this process can repeat itself continuously until all the holders of evil are deceased or have their evil “cured”. Evil has often been rid of but one question always remains regarding the effects of evil. This question is whether or not a man embarking to rid evil can do so without turning evil himself. In reality, regardless of how unbreakable a hero’s resolve is, if he aspires to expunge evil, he will become evil one way or another.

In the play one can see that Hamlet's behavior and attitude progress throughout the play towards evil. In the start of the play, he is originally a respected and wise young adult. A pivotal turning point for him was when he learns from the ghost (his dead father) that the new king, Claudius, has murdered him in order to reach the high status of king. At this point Hamlet becomes incensed and plans to kill his uncle for revenge. Hamlet changes for the worst so much that Ophelia, whom he greatly loved, turns into just another girl to him. He even gets into a raging argument with her pro...

... middle of paper ...

...miled upon to forgive the wrongs of one who betrays. If forgiveness did not exist the world would have crazy people like Hamlet killing and getting even with everyone with the justification that it makes the world a better place. In this case, everyone would essentially be evil and lose all sense of morals too. What Hamlet does in this play is a poor example of how to handle presented problem as it only led to the deaths of Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Gertrude, Polonius, Laertes, and even himself . Were it not for Hamlets evil inner change for the sake of revenge none of these characters would have died. The quote “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” (Mahatma Ghandi) could not be more true in this play and in the world as the deaths of all the characters in the play and the demise of many in the world are the byproducts of both evil and revenge.

Open Document