The Portrayal of the Community in Raveloe in Silas Marner by George Eliot

2735 Words6 Pages

The Portrayal of the Community in Raveloe in Silas Marner by George Eliot

Silas Marner by George Eliot was first published in 1861 during the

industrial revolution. The industrial revolution, as the

transformation came to be called, caused a sustained rise in real

income per person in England and, as its effects spread, the rest of

the Western world. Historians agree that the industrial revolution was

one of the most important events in history, marking the rapid

transition to the modern age, but they disagree vehemently about

various aspects of the event. The Industrial Revolution reshaped the

urban environment, not least by concentrating workers in the new

industrial towns and suburbs linked and supplied by railways. The

industrial revolution meant the poor could find jobs especially in big

cities such as London and Manchester. It also took trade from small

companies or people.

The picture of Gin Lane shows the distress of working in the

industrialized towns and cities. The picture emphasizes the massive

difference between town and country life and how many people where

unhappy working and living in this environment.

The village hierarchy was based upon distinct social roles and

responsibilities. Dunsey was known throughout the village to be a good

man who never did anything wrong, although some of the village folk

did have there doubts. This was the general presumption among the

village folk because of his social role. Yet the Dunsey did do things

wrong but was not at all suspected by the village folk of stealing

Silas's money because of his position as the Squire Casses son. Dunsey

thought because he had all the money in...

... middle of paper ...

...ustrialized towns are still grim looking and there is still an

element of competitiveness but the machines rules man and the Puritan

evangelicalism has not completely gone but is not as obvious in

today's industrialized towns and cities.

I think the moral of this novel is to show that no amount of money can

ever replace love or happiness. I think this is completely true you

can have all the money in the world but still not be happy. I think

money makes you selfish and self-centered. This glorifies the past

village life because they did not have much money but they all loved

one another and they were happier than the Squires family, who had all

the money in the world which just proves my point. We can relate it to

Elvis Presley - he had all the money in the world yet he wasn't happy

and took a drugs overdose and died.

Open Document