The Plea Deal Analysis

When it comes to the accuracy of emotions, Naz failed in controlling his emotions while making the plea deal decision. Even though his decision of rejecting the plea deal turned out to be the right choice, he did not follow the factors of making an effective decision. Furthermore, Naz’s accurate intuition was shown in his belief that he did not commit the murder, which turned out to be right. Before rejecting the plea deal, Naz agreed to all the crimes he committed including the murder by answering “yes” to all the D.A.’s questions. However, when he was asked to admit to the murder crime using his own words, he could not do it. He paused for a minute, then said that he did not kill her. Even though Naz did not remember parts of what happened that night, and he had no evidence at the decision time, he had an accurate intuition that he was incapable of committing manslaughter. Despite the fact the Naz was an honored student, he was not familiar with the court process. He showed in the earliest episode that he did not know his right of an attorney. This was a new horrible experience for Naz. In fact, Naz used his previous experience when his lawyer Crowe told him to take the deal, in dealing with his previous lawyer, Stone who came just before the hearing to advise Naz to take the deal. He quietly acknowledged that both lawyers are behaving in the same way. They both assumed

In this case study, Crowe was believing that she knows what is the best choice for Naz. Crowe was believing that she understands Naz’s case better than anyone else, and she is smart enough to get the plea deal for Naz. Based on Naz’s case circumstances, at the time of rejecting the plea deal, the best option for Naz is to take the deal. Even though Stone, in later episodes, keeps looking for evidence that supports Naz, at the time of the hearing, acted the same way as