The Picture Of Dorian Gray Research Paper

1863 Words4 Pages

The Picture of Dorian Gray, a novel by Oscar Wilde, shows the consequences of breaking from reality for fantasy. In Dorian Gray, Lord Henry tempts the young beautiful Dorian from his every day and normal life to a time of wild desires and whims. The ideology of Aestheticism that captivates Dorian, though seemingly glamorous, has the cost of one’s life. Oscar Wilde, known for his Aesthetic outlook, says his novel Dorian Gray is moral and lesson free. In his Preface, he goes as far to say, “There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written or badly written. That is all” (pg. 4). However, Dorian Gray can be read as a critique of aestheticism, even if not what Wilde intended. Dorian’s consequences of trying to live by …show more content…

He lived the life and agreed with the philosophy and movement. Wilde is actually a main figure in the Aestheticism movement. It would not make sense for him to analyze his own lifestyle he was living. However, The Picture of Dorian Gray is not the first time Oscar Wilde’s stories have been read as a critique against morality and beauty. At the University Of North Texas, a professor, Dr. Justin Travis Jones, published in an article titled ‘Morality’s Ugly Implications in Oscar Wilde’s Fairy Tales’. Dr. Jones main point is how in Wilde’s stories, the moral lesson of the characters is usually accompanied with ugly physical traits, which “shifts…the tale’s fundamental concept of beauty”. Dorian Gray, while remaining handsome, bears the scars of his lack of morals on his painting. The ideal of beauty and innocent in the beginning is shifted, and the beauty is a mask hiding and concealing true horror. More than that, a moral lesson is always learned at the end of the stories, and in The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian learns his own consequences. He realizes all of what he has given up, the horror at himself when he looks at the painting, and his lesson about trying to live an aesthetic life set him on a path he could never come back from. His epiphany at the end makes it logical that the book is a critique on the negatives of aestheticism, or at least the dangers of living it

Open Document