Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Play versus movie romeo and juliet
Play versus movie romeo and juliet
A comparison of two film versions of william skakespear's romeo and juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Play versus movie romeo and juliet
What was better; the book or the movie? That is a question that is asked about movies based off a story. However, in the two movies based off Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” they have introduced two different and unique representations of this legendary tragedy. One of the films perspectives is set in modern day, yet at the same time it keeps the original script used for the play. Likewise, the film from the 1980’s still keeps to the true version of Romeo and Juliet as Shakespeare wrote it. Even though the movies were sensational, the original work by Shakespeare was more superior to the others.
The first movie taken in the 1980’s was not as good at the original. This is due to the acting in the movie that took away from the original characters and their characterization. One example of this can be seen with Friar Lawrence, and it is seen when he leaves Juliet with Romeos body. What happens is that he seems more courageous, and tries to get Juliet out of there. However, he simply offers her little to no help in the original, and then ditches her with giving her no help what so ever. The next flaw compared to the original by Shakespeare is in the themes, and that the original focuses more on true love while the other focuses on the consequences of forbidden love. This can be seen by how dramatic and painful Romeos death is by poison and Juliet’s gory death by stabbing herself. This emphasis the consequences that are created by dangerous love. Likewise, in the original they do it gently and fast to make it seem like less of a sacrifice. The final way the Shakespearian version is better is due to the setting. The reasoning for this is because in the original the setting was open to the reader’s interpretations. While the movie just ...
... middle of paper ...
...original is better than both films can be seen in the music. What the music does in both the films is it creates an atmosphere not created by the text. This can be seen in the older version with the music is too uptight making the viewer focus too much on the moments in the story. One example of this is in this is in the tense sound track during the fight scenes in the market. Overall, both the movies truly do not compare to the original story because is takes away from the atmosphere created by the costuming and music.
In the end the original stands out much more compared to the movies of it. It takes away from the movies from the theme presented to the music chose for it. These flaws and many more take almost the whole experience away. Truly in the end the far superior best telling of Romeo and Juliet is in the origional, and it truly provides the best experience.
A Comparison of the Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet I have been studying the prologue to 'Romeo and Juliet' written by the magnificent playwright, William Shakespeare sometime between 1594 and 1596. Still globally acknowledged, it has been restyled by many directors for both stage and screen. Shakespeare starts his play with a prologue: an introduction to a play or other piece of writing. The prologue sets the tone of the theatrical production; it outlines
Paramount aspect of the movie and the play, the theme, were the same, and the overall messages in both were the same. For example, one main message in the stories was that love conquers all. This was demonstrated in both the play and the film when Romeo and Juliet kept secretly meeting each other even though they knew it was against their families’ wishes. In one scene of both the movie and the play Romeo and Juliet even got married and died together so that even if they could not be together on earth they would be together in death.
In conclusion, Romeo and Juliet, is the perfect of Shakespeare plays to be done as a film, both filmmakers had different interpretation of the story. It is a film, which can reach the masses, everyone is familiar with it, and it is a great story.
It is more relatable, even enjoyable, taking Shakespeare's script and supplying a well adapted motion picture for the younger generation. However, Zeffirelli conveyed what would have been the best adaptation of Shakespeare, gaining yet another, final round-of-applause from The Bard.
To conclude, the characters in “Romeo and Juliet” are all different in the text and film. Also the setting is different and there a main and minor points in both text and film. In my opinion, I prefer the Luhrman’s film as it is modern and simple to understand. This is because Luhrman’s film is modern which makes it more interesting because there are guns and cars which shows us the technology in the 21st century whereas in the text there are traditional settings, props etc. This doesn’t appeal to a wide range of audience in the 21st century because no one uses a sword and a horse for transport.
When comparing and contrasting Zeffirelli's and Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet to Shakespeare’s play, Zeffirelli's adaptation is seen as more accurate to Shakespeare’s play than Luhrmann’s movie adaptation. Zeffirelli sets the scenes and designs costumes that are consistent with the play and portrays Juliet as a heroine that Shakespeare depicts in his play. An original and classic story like Romeo and Juliet should be left untouched to feel the full effect of what a great story should
Shakespeare's is one of the most read writers ever and his writing was so successful that not just one group of people liked it. He did this by relating to his audience using universal truths. . Human emotions are not something that change over time and they are also known as universal truths; love, hate, revenge, and envy are all examples of universal truths. This play was so successful that many other movies have copied the plot but changed the scenery. Over the past 400 years since this play was written the world has changed drastically, but the emotions and feelings in this play have withstood the test of time. This is why the movies, Romeo and Juliet (1996) and West Side Story (1961) were so successful. Shakespeare's play and the two movies modeled after it have many similarities and many differences, but one thing remains constant in all of them, They all use universal truths to relate to their audiences.
A similarity between the story and the play is the part where both Juliet’s say they wish that their Romeo’s was not from the rival family. In Gnomeo and Juliet, Juliet say, “why must you wear blue,”(Gnomeo and Juliet). In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet says, “Deny thy father and refuse thy name,”(Folger Digital Texts, n.d.). They both wish they were from the same house/garden because they believe they could be together easier that way. This similarity gave the mood sad and heartbreaking mood. A difference between the movie and play is the fact that Juliet from the movie confessed her love for Romeo to their families, but Juliet from the play didn’t. In Gnomeo and Juliet, Juliet tells everyone she loves him after they believe he got ran over by a truck in the middle of the street. Her confession had an impact on the ending of their story. In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet never told her parents about her love and marriage with Romeo. Juliet’s silence had an affect to their ending. Gnomeo Juliet speaking out and expressing her love helped the families come to terms with their relationship, but Juliet and Romeo’s secrecy of their relationship took part in their deaths. They both were from rival families and loved each other, but they chose different paths and made different choices. This difference gave the movie a joyful mood, but the play, a sentimental and sorrowful
William Shakespeare wrote his ever famous play, Romeo and Juliet, in 1595. Like many of Shakespeare’s plays, the story of Romeo and Juliet is timeless and has proven to remain perhaps the most popular story of tragic love. In 1968, 373 years after the play was originally written, a new movie was released and hailed as a new and futuristic Romeo and Juliet. This film is directed by Franco Zeffirelli and stars Leonard Whiting as Romeo and Olivia Hussey as Juliet. Then, in 1996, a mere 401 years after Shakespeare’s original production, Baz Luhrmann directed a new Romeo and Juliet that features Leonardo Dicaprio as Romeo and Claire Danes as Juliet. This film is extremely futuristic compared to any other version that has been produced. The two films differ from Shakespeare’s original play in some respects, but most viewers would agree that these films both follow Shakespeare’s story with adaptations to the time at which they were produced.
Another big difference is the “appeal” of the movies. Zeffirelli’s version is more fitting of Shakespeare’s time era, and clearly illustrates the factors of the renaissance. Zeffirelli’s interpretation also makes it easier to envision the setting, actors, and culture that are part of the classic Romeo and Juliet. In spite of this, Luhmann’s modern version
As a lover of books, I am often very disappointed by the movies based off of books. This was the case with both of the Romeo and Juliet movies we watched in class because it differed from the play Romeo and Juliet quite a bit. The 1968 and the 1996 movies based off of William Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet, are alike in few ways but they deviate from each other very much. A few examples of how they veer from the actual play include the balcony scene, Tybalt’s death, and even the letter that was sent to Romeo by Friar Lawrence.
Romeo and Juliet is a very dramatic story that hasn’t been remade since shakespeare published it. The movie and book had very few differences, which surprised me quite a bit, but they had a lot of similarities for example in the movie that I found there wasn’t any sound. Which made it difficult to understand what was going on during multiple scenes. The book was more enjoyable considering it had more details and it’s more accurate than the movie.
The director doing this could have also been, so the movie would be able to get newer, more popular actors to take an interest in it. With these points into consideration, it is a reasonable answer to say the direction the director took with his version of Romeo and Juliet was the right idea as it would bring in more people and benefit more people. There are many differences and similarities between Romeo and Juliet and Romeo + Juliet. One similarity was the Old English used in both the play and the movie. The director kept this the same to keep some people interested in the weird, uncommon language used.
The modern version of Romeo and Juliet’s love is more believable than the on depicted in the original movie. This is because the modern version uses scenes such as the meeting, balcony and death scene to portray a sense of true love. From beginning to end many scenes in the modern movie have the ability to bring viewers to tears and make them feel as if they are apart of the couples love themselves.
Franco Zeffirelli’s version of Romeo and Juliet is more effective, in my opinion, because of its music. The songs slow down, and become softer. This represents both the