The Negative Consequences Of Medicalization

871 Words2 Pages

3. Medicalization is the process by which human conditions and problems come to be defined and treated as medical conditions, and thus become One example of medicalization is with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the categorization and construction of categories of mental disorder. One positive aspect about the medicalization of mental health is that it leads us to search for their genetic roots, to assess other individual risk factors, and search for treatments for mental health, a condition that prior to medicalization had been overlooked. On the other hand medicalization has negative consequences. By giving the sufferer a sick role, medicalization can stigmatize as well as protect an individual resulting …show more content…

One particular example is with the response from the LGBTQ community to the HIV/AIDs Crisis in the United States. Sociologist Steve Epstein states that, “The AIDS movement...was built on the foundation of the gay and lesbian movement and borrowed from its particular strengths and inclinations” Specificalyy the LGBTQ community protested lack of access to crucial antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) that were needed by many members of their community. Pharmacutilizaion of these ARVs barred access to these drugs. Pharmaceuticalization can be defined as “the process by which social, behavioral, or bodily conditions are treated, or deemed to be in need of treatment/intervention, with pharmaceuticals by doctors, patients or both”. The politics of treatment access fuel much activism of the LGBTQ community which overall resulted in government intervention in making ARVs more readily available and …show more content…

The Alma-Ata Declaration of 1978 was the first international statement emphasizing the importance of primary health care in reducing global health disparities. The Declaration defined primary health care as a collaborative effort involving all participants in the health system, from individuals and communities, to health providers, to national health services. Key issues discussed in the Alma Ata principles that are relevant today are Appropriate technology, Medical elitism, Health as a tool for development (“intersectoral” approach). Specifically with appropriate technology we face the issue of finding technology that most effectively meets people's’ needs in developing or limited resource settings. This can be viewed in lack of access to sophisticated prenatal care in underdeveloped countries which may require access to ultrasound machines. “Reductions in global health disparities would be supported by practical, effective and socially acceptable technologies that are accessible, affordable by community and national health systems, encourage self reliance, and result from participatory processes” (Alma Ata 1978). In the case of medical elitism they called against the use of external consultants from Western Europe/US or Global North and against the emphasis on technical/biomedical interventions (magic bullet approach). Using a nuanced and historically deep approach prevents such elitism issues from occurring. Lastly the Alma Ata called for the reduction in health

Open Document