The Name Of War Analysis

1065 Words3 Pages

The Name of War by Jill Lepore and Anne Orthwood’s Bastard by John Pagan are ideal examples of works detailing historical perspectives or occurrences. The authors utilize two different approaches to narrate these historical occurrences. Jill Lepore uses a macro-history approach whereas John Pagan uses a micro-history approach. However, both authors relay various developments in the American history. Macro-history takes a long approach to present an issue whereas a micro-history utilizes micro topics or several components to reveal a wider theme. This report shows how these approaches have been used by Jill Lepore and John Pagan in their respective works. Macro The Name of War tells the story of how an Indian man was tortured to death by …show more content…

The author takes the time to describe activities and people including the issues surrounding illegitimacy, the Kendall's, the court clerk, the ship’s surgeon, the midwife among others. These stories and people are the small but vital components of ‘micro’ topics that constitute micro-history. Together, the ‘micro’ topics reveal to the readers the legal system of Virginia and England, the role of women in the society, contracts and sale of servants, criminal fornication and the involvement of the church in state …show more content…

Authors using the approach take the time to explain the background and the context of the historical account so that the writers can easily understand. However, the approach fails to capture the exact experience of the people involved or affected. On the other hand, a micro approach goes into detail of what happened and its effect on the people directly involved or affected. It captures the emotion, reaction and experience of these people without which a historical account is not complete. The disadvantage of the micro approach is that it fails to show the overview of the historical event or occurrence and, therefore, does not put into context. Consequently, the reader must have background knowledge of the occurrence or else, they may not understand the historical text. Personally, a micro-history approach is the most persuasive and interesting while investigating and explaining the dynamics of early American society and culture because it captures the emotion and experience of people as they lived through the event of historical significance. It is easy to put things in perspective because of numerous history lessons and therefore, a micro-history approach would be much more interesting compared to a macro-history. This type of history is very interesting because it happened to other people; their experiences, reactions, and emotions are worth

Open Document