The Myth Of Krishna And Purushartha Moksha

676 Words2 Pages

In Hindu mythology, Krishna is an incarnation or avatar of Vishnu; unlike other incarnations; however, Krishna is regarded as the Purna avatar or complete incarnation because he embodies all the attributes of the ideal, well-rounded personality. As Pavan K. Varma notes, a very important aspect of this ideal personality is that of the accomplished lover; Krishna is the lover-God, capable of both feeling and invoking sexual desire. This seemingly “profane” attribute of a sacred god-figure begins to be comprehensible when seen in the larger context of Hinduism’s Four Cardinal Principles or Purushartha Chatushtham: Dharma, Artha, Kaama, and Moksha. The role of Kaama or desire is thus enshrined within the socio-religious order itself, and is not seen as extrinsic to it. However, it is certainly the case that desire, although very much validated, is certainly also regulated. Therefore, where the myth of Krishna scores over and above other similar Hindu myths—and here Nair uses “myth” as a generic term to refer to lore, folktale, epic and legend, both written and oral—is, as Varma says, in sanctifying sexual desire even outside the boundaries of conventional morality. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Krishna’s relationship with Radha.
Radha occupies a very interesting place in Hindu mythology. Many authors have pointed out that her name finds no mention in the earlier authoritative texts on Krishna, such as the Mahabharata, the Harivamsa, the Vishnu Purana (circa CE 300 to 600), and the Bhagvata Purana, and though there are scattered references to her in folklore and poetry from the sixth century CE onwards, only in the thirteenth century does Puranic literature accord her a well-formed identity (Varma 42-43; Rao 44-45). Finally, it...

... middle of paper ...

...ian aesthetics. In the novel, the nine Rasas of Bharata’s Natyashastra become more than just aesthetic emotions to be performed by the Kathakali dancer on stage. Through a clever use of the nine Rasas, the novel depicts not just the context within which Radha’s adultery begins to take shape, but also ultimately foregrounds her point of view.
Thus, through the lens of sringaaram or love, we see how Radha’s absence of desire for her older husband Shyam has left vacant an emotional space within which her desire for the American travel writer and cello player Chris is born. Through Radha’s eyes, we see Shyam as a materialistic businessman who understands neither art nor aesthetics, who constantly embarrasses Radha by exhibiting
“A carelessness that is so typical of him,” and who in her words “wasn’t just a sham; he was an uncouth boor, this husband of mine” (Nair 9).18

Open Document