The Modern Prison Paradox Summary

636 Words2 Pages

In The Modern Prison Paradox, Amy Lerman examines the negative consequences of modern imprisonment on those who are locked up as well as those whose jobs is it to monitor and supervise. She also examines the consequences of concentration high number of ex-prisoners in certain communities. She argues that imprisonment has a negative consequence for crime control, for the people that work in prisons and for American community’s wellbeing. In chapter one, Lerman argues that prison social contexts create more criminals rather than reformed citizens. Instead of educating inmates on ways to become productive members of society, prison actually “confine[s] individuals together who can share information and resources related to criminal activity” (Lerman, 108), prison not only increases social ties, but prisons is also bridge “for the transmission of collective norms and values… alienation from law-abiding …show more content…

Higher-security officers are different than other officers both in how they see their role when it comes to inmate’s rehabilitation (130) and how they go about fulfilling their duties as officers (134). Higher-security officers are much more likely not to “support offering either academic training at the college level or vocational training” (144) for inmates. Which suggests the purpose of incarceration for these officers is not one based on rehabilitating inmates but based on holding them from society. Higher-security officers are also different when it comes to going about their duties, they are less likely “to contact a supervisor for help” (134). Making it more difficult for these officers to get advice on issues that require supervisor expertise. Furthermore, this will likely result in higher-security officers using entirely arbitrary powers to resolve issues that come with interacting with

Open Document