The Mining Industry

1386 Words3 Pages

Mining, clean water, and healthy eco systems can and do exist together. This is the idea behind corporate social responsibility initiatives within the extractive industry. The mining industry produces waste that has negative impacts on the environment; however, mining companies have and continue to make important changes and investments in Research and Development in order to modernize past practices. The industry is proactive and demonstrates strong environmental leadership. To maintain licenses to operate, companies must consider and address social issues and environmental concerns throughout the lifecycle of the project from design, to closure, and future impacts. Recently, green mining initiative groups, (specifically in the U.S. and Canada), have begun working more closely with governments, industry, academia, NGOs and other interested stakeholders to improve the mining sector’s environmental performance and create green technology opportunities.
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is a publically traded mineral exploration and development company that is part of the Hunter Dickinson Group based in Vancouver, British Columbia. Northern Dynasty’s only focus is the advancement of The Pebble Project, the world’s largest undeveloped gold and copper project in Alaska. With many more permitting milestones ahead, Northern Dynasty is well positioned with the support of a driving force within the mining industry, associate company, Hunter Dickinson. Within the group there are eight public companies. CEO, Ronald Thiessen, describes the group as an “incubator” of mineral resource companies. The group places one project within the company and looks after it for the shareholders for that company until they reach a decision to joint venture it...

... middle of paper ...

...he “…EPA released drafts of the watershed assessment in May 2012, and April 2013, to widespread criticism about the report's flawed methodology and findings, including from the state of Alaska, Alaska Native groups and expert peer reviewers commissioned by the federal agency” and insists that “EPA (had) repeatedly failed to meet its own guidelines and policies for watershed assessments, risk assessment and peer review, and violated the US Information Quality Act”. Thiessen also adds that the report did not contain any suggestions or regulatory actions that would affect future development of the project and is looking forward to “... defining a proposed development plan for Pebble and to having it reviewed by federal and state regulatory agencies under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in the months and years ahead” (Lazenby, 2014).

Open Document