The Miller's Tale

1113 Words3 Pages

The Miller's Tale The Miller’s Tale is in the form of fabliaux, which is part of the oral tradition of storytelling, which was very popular among the lower classes in the medieval times. Prominently bawdy and satirizing in content, fabliaux commonly told the story of a bourgeois husband who is cuckolded by his young wife. Fabliaux brings a great contrast to the likes of the courtly love tales such as the Knight’s Tale, thus it reflects Chaucer’s social and literary experience. The coarse, colloquial language and the realistic setting makes it convincing that a ‘cherl’ like the Miller could have told this story as it shows the Miler’s unrefined and crude nature. Furthermore, the use of animal imagery in the Miller’s portrait highlights the Miller’s aggressive and lewd characteristics. However, it appears unconvincing that a drunken ‘cherl’ could have created this tale as there are numerous reference to ancient philosophy, education and the gospels which makes it doubtful that an uneducated man could have been aware of them all. Additionally, the tale is structured as a parody of the Knight’s Tale and courtly love values and the consistency in the imagery and poetic devise used seem beyond the capabilities of a drunken ‘cherl.’ In the prologue, the Miller is conveyed as being mischievous and witty when he clearly implies that the host Harry Bailly is to blame for his drunkenness-‘And therefore if that I misspeke or seye, Wite it the ale of Southwerk.’ As Harry Bailly is the landlord of the Tabard Inn at Southwark, The Miller here is making the host responsible for getting him drunk. As well as this, the Miller is portrayed as being ve... ... middle of paper ... ...nd had also written ‘Treatise on the Astrolabe.’ As a consequence, it does not seem justified that a man like the Miller would have known about Latin Literature and astrology. Chaucer has added this reference to add humour as john is portrayed as being foolish for not knowing about Cato, which would have been a common view, held by the Medieval people. All in all, the Miller’s Tale’s bawdy and humorous nature could be seen as convincing and well suited to a drunken ‘cherl’ like the Miller. However, the references to education, philosophy, the sophisticated and complex structure employed and the consistent imagery makes it unconvincing and impossible that the Miller could have told this story. To conclude, I do not believe that a drunken cherl would tell a tale so beautifully structured and delightfully crafted.

Open Document