Mexican Maquiladoras Essay

4153 Words9 Pages

The Mexican Maquiladoras

As a major contributor to the global economy, Mexico’s sweatshops have contributed to the United States’ wealth and economic growth. It is the unfortunate truth that many individual workers have suffered as a result of this prosperity. The sweatshops, known as maquiladoras, are in debate because of the ethical and lawful reasoning behind their existence and conditions. How can we, as a First-world nation, allow such industries to exist where people are denied basic and fundamental human rights? What, if any, laws and regulations are put into place for the maquiladoras? Are these laws and regulations hindering, harmful, or helpful? Are they enforced emphatically? If not, how does this affect development? After …show more content…

Dordecht further elaborates on the dangers that the workers are subjected to as a result of their jobs in the maquiladoras. "The maquiladora industry (also called maquilas), Mexico’s contribution to this form of production, has been accused of a number of ethical shortcomings. Firms that move to Mexico are no longer subjected to the relatively strict environmental and workplace safety standards common in the developed world. While Mexico has established regulations in these areas, they are often not well enforced. Unsafe working conditions and serious environmental problems have been reported by a number of sources (cf. Hosmer and Masten, 1995; Butler and Teagarden, 1993)." (Dordrecht, 1999: p.2) Therefore, the idea that regulations have been put into place, but not enforced or followed, disgruntles and angers many who are striving to preserve the dignity and well-being of maquiladora workers. It should be noted why these transnational corporations are located in Mexico instead of the United States. Peña also provides us with the United States’ motives for relocation. "Research demonstrates that many corporations have relocated to Mexico and other third-world countries to escape stricter environmental regulations in the United States. Even so, bilateral regulations adopted at the 1993 La Paz Agreement require that maquilas return their toxic …show more content…

Workers are suffering, while we are reaping the benefits that result from a capitalist society and global economy. "From an ecological and feminist perspective, moreover, even if there were more globes to be exploited, it is not even desirable that this development paradigm and standard of living was generalized, because it has failed to fulfill its promises of happiness, freedom, dignity and peace, even for those who have profited from it." (Mies and Shiva, p.322) I strongly agree with Mies and Shiva’s anti-capitalist discourse of the undesirable path that capitalism has paved. In terms of the situation in Mexico, it is obvious that not only revision of the law is necessary, but more importantly, actual enforcement of the existing laws is absolutely imperative. It is a beginning when one worker gathers others to rebel the injustices that they face in their everyday lives. In fact, I think it is within this amazing rebellion that one can seek the virtues that arise from struggles and hardships. "Strikes are after all the refusal of work, and nothing is more crippling to capitalist production than the conscious and absolute withdrawal of labor power. Strikes, and especially wildcats, have the potential to transform the relations of production and to challenge the conditions of domination and exploitation." (Peña, p. 128) However, it is the governments’

Open Document