The Menace Of Communism Analysis

1418 Words3 Pages

In the first document, A. Mitchell Palmer, attacks the “Reds” and explains the menace of communism. His purpose is to describe the importance of cleaning up the country of any virile legislation. Although he did not specially define “good Americanism” in his article, Palmer does discuss a major threat to the American society; communism. First, he discusses that the “Reds” are criminal aliens and secondly, that the American government must prevent crime. So, he decided that there could be no nice distinctions drawn between the theoretical ideals of the radicals and their actual violations of our national laws. He said, “This is no place for the criminal to flourish, nor will he do so, so long as the rights of common citizenship can be exerted …show more content…

To prevent a communistic society, the United States began arresting and deporting the “alien enemies” (“Reds”) back to Germany. By getting rid of the alien enemies, Palmer believed the American society would remove the menace of Bolshevism for good. Although some modern day countries practice communism, it no longer poses a threat to our democratic society. In communist societies, freedom of speech, press, and religion is suppressed beyond the wildest imaginations of Americans who only know such freedoms. Today, Americans would not stand to have their freedoms suppressed, let alone taken away. In Hiram Evans’ The Klan's Fight for Americanism, he describes the three vital elements to achieve “good Americanism” that fulfill the aspirations and justify the heroism of the men who made the nation. has been an essential part of Americanism ever since the days of Roanoke and Plymouth Rock. They are condensed into the Klan slogan: “Native, white, Protestant supremacy.” The three elements include patriotism, loyalty to the white race, and the supremacy of Protestantism. According to Evans, these elements had been an essential part of Americanism ever since the days of Roanoke and Plymouth Rock and are condensed …show more content…

34 of the U.S. Army. Korematsu was not excluded from the military area because of his race; he was excluded because America was at war with the Japanese. Authorities feared an invasion of the West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures. As a result, the military demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast temporarily. This order drew much controversy and questioned whether it violated the Constitution. According to Felix Frankfurter, it was an offense for Korematsu to be found in Military Area No. 1, the territory where in he was previously living. Frankfurter argued the provisions of the Constitution which confer on the Congress and the President powers to enable this country to wage war are as much part of the Constitution as provisions looking to a nation at peace. Therefore, the validity of action under the war power should be judged wholly in the context of war, not racism. He said, “I find nothing in the Constitution which denies to Congress the power to enforce such a valid military order by making its violation an offense triable in the civil courts” (Supreme Court...). On the opposing side, Justice Frank Murphy issued a statement saying that the exclusion of Japanese “falls into the ugly abyss of racism”

More about The Menace Of Communism Analysis

Open Document