More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis malcolm X and luther King Jr
Mlk vs malcolm x differences and similarities approaches
Similarities and differences between mlk and Malcolm
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Meeting Critique
The Play The Meeting is a play written by Jeff Stetson that portrays the theoretical meeting of Malcom X and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The play’s opening scene shows both men on opposite sides of the stage with spotlights on them. They take turns speaking to make it seem as if these interactions are happening at separate locations and at different points in time. We can assume they’re being interviewed because we hear a voice offstage asking the men questions. However, in these interviews, neither man is known by the public for accomplishing anything, almost as if the revolution they created had never happened. Directly following, Malcom wakes up from his nightmare, which is what the audience just witnessed. Based on
…show more content…
Physically, he resembled the real life Malcom; tall, thin, and wears glasses. This physical resemblance helped the audience remember that the characters in the show were based on real people from the past. Appearance aside, the way the actor played his character was extremely authentic. What I found most enduring was how you could see the characters transformation throughout the play through the actors’ delivery of the lines. At the beginning of the play when he was talking with Dr. King, the actor gave his lines bitterly; we could hear his anger towards Dr. King in his voice when he spoke. However, as the play progressed and Malcom began to find respect for Dr. King, the way the actor spoke changed. Although you could still hear the passion in his voice, it was rooted in understanding rather than resentment. Also throughout the play, the actors’ facial expressions revealed how he thought and felt about what he was speaking …show more content…
King. Much like the actor who played Malcom X, the actor who played Dr. King physically resembled the real life doctor, which makes the show seem more historically accurate. Based on videos of speeches I’ve seen of Dr. King, the actor that played him delivered his lines just as the real man used to speak. The actor spoke with kindness and respect, even when talking about the grave issues discussed within the show. When speaking, the actor was fully absorbed in his conversation with Malcom, which make the performance exceptionally believable. The actor walked around the stage leisurely, which reflected the patience he had when speaking to
Dr. King is a man who is over flowed of nothing but creditability. Not once he pointed his finger as a child would and blame the Caucasian men for forcing the African-American to attempt to survive a horrific ordeal of history. He encouraged his brother and sisters of color not to protests with bitter and physical violence but to engage hands and peacefully demand to be treated equally. He encouraged his colored brothers and sisters to go back to where they are from with not despair in their hearts, but hope that one day there will be freedom within reach.
McClain, who played the Camae, the angel. Unlike Martin Luther King Jr., Camae is not a representation of any human in reality, therefore the actor has less restraint to express their creative freedom and artistic capabilities in an attempt to create an individual from scratch with no prior information on them as cheat sheet of persuasion. With the character of Martin Luther King Jr. one can proceed to fill in the objectives and tactics in accordance with the research on him and the aspects of his life which one should be conducted immediately, but with a character like Camae, you do not get that opportunity. Instead, you get the script and the end results depend on whether you're capable of thoroughly analyzing the character, picking up on what the playwright intends, and creating a person from scratch. Also, Camae serves as a storytelling device, that allows the audience to witness a more personal side of Dr. King which the public eye has never viewed. Not only does she show this idolized man as just a human, but she also represents the baton he passes in the fight for equality as she expresses her own views on racism, poverty, and the civil rights movement. She is important by demonstrating that anyone can reach out and help resolve injustice and inequality, even a maid can be as kind as an
Malcom X’s outlook on race goes through many stages of change throughout his life. As a child, Malcom X was immediately categorized as black and poor, therefore being a lower class citizen and creating a lack of exposure and diversity of ideologies. As he grows up and meets new people he is introduced to different lifestyles and for once has an opportunity to choose what kind of life he is going to lead. This creates a young man who does not his own identity and is soul searching. Ideas are introduced to him slowly. Everybody he meets has something new and exciting to offer to him.
to be more clearly presented. He made the scene of the poem less dream-like and more like an
Perhaps one of his most sustained acts was his ability to represent the plight of African American rights while simultaneously portraying a palatable character to White America. In addition to leading various civil disobedience campaigns, he served as the movement’s main “strategist, theorist, and symbol maker” while also becoming the “movement’s chief interpreter to white Americans.” Stewart Burns actually goes so far as to suggest King, early on, realized his destiny was to be both a black Moses, delivering his brothers from the injustice of Jim Crow, as well as a Christ-like figure, offering equal measures of love, compassion, and forgiveness. This of course caused him to be disliked and criticized amongst some of the more nationalist and militant black leaders of the time, but inversely, allowed many Americans to sympathize with the movement’s main goals.
Dr. King is very articulate person because he measures his words carefully and knows he wants to say by expressing himself easily and confidently which makes the leader understand him.
The AA meeting I attended took place at a church. The church that holds the meeting has a beginner AA meeting that meets Monday nights at 7 pm. However, I decided to go to the regularly meeting which takes place an hour later at 8 pm. I felt as though I would get more out of the regular meetings and get a sense of what regular AA members talk about. Before arriving at the meeting, I was a little anxious because I felt like as though I would be out of place, and I would be intruding on the members who come to the meetings for support. Also before attending, for some unknown reason, I imagined the meeting would to be similar to AA meeting featured in movies. Contrary to what I thought, the meeting was completely different. When I arrived at
Attending an NA meeting during finals was one of my smarter decisions, as I procrastinate my work until the very last minute this week. However, in my opinion, going to a meeting was a good type of procrastination compared to other things I could be doing. Instead of going with the same friend this time, I asked a friend who was struggling with a ________ addiction. Not knowing that I was aware of his addiction, I asked him to join so I didn’t have to go alone; and he was more than happy to join me. I was very happy he agreed to join, because hopefully it helps him with his personal addiction, and he continues to return to the meetings.
Martin Luther King Jr. was definitely an influential speaker and writer. He was able to move people with his ideas and words. In his letter from the Birmingham jail he was trying to inform people of the injustices that African Americans were experiencing at this time. His audience was mainly the clergymen of the church. Since most Americans at this time believed that African Americans were uneducated and not on the same level as white Americans, MLK had to prove otherwise. MLK did this by using strong rhetoric in his speeches and letters. Two of the rhetoric styles that I feel was most effective were his use of logic and pathos. MLK knew that if he was going to make an impression on his audience he was going to have to bring his A game.
...ll of the charges that were brought upon him and he answers them all in full detail and truth. He addresses his audience with honesty and respect, without making his readers feeling like they were being vanquished. Instead they were being made aware of what their actions were doing to society, and that they could make a difference. Dr. King uses a very strong pathos while speaking to his audience. He helps them to see things from his perspective. He uses detailed stories that make the reader feel like they are seeing what is going on. He also uses his ethos to show his respect for the audience, which in turn puts a positive spin on the negativity of the whole situation.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. uses the appeal of ethos from the beginning until the end of his speech. Because he was talking about African-American people, his own race that were dealing with racism and discrimination. However, Dr. King uses all the rhetorical devices in many ways to the best of his ability to gain the favor of his audience, and he made an unforgettable and effectively speech that made an impact on America. His main purpose was to fight for the equal rights of African-American people and in order for him to do that, he aided the civil rights to help his own race to improve their
Through making the audience realize this, he also gave them hope for a world reborn without racism, without segregation, without discrimination, and without hate. King wanted his children to live in a world without judgment of race, but with the consideration of personality, for nobody should not endure judgment because of the way that they look. He spoke of his own children, which introduced a reinforced emotional attachment to the audience; this gave many parents a scenario to relate to because no parent wants their child exposed to the horrid crimes of discrimination.... ... middle of paper ... ...
He had good diction and projection during the play. In the black box, they did not have microphones, so the audience had to be silent in order to listen to the actors. Marquis had no problem with his words and yelling at times to emphasis words. During the play, he made it clear how he felt towards certain individuals. He had crushes on some of the other characters, while others he despised with hatred. He was very consistent when taking different forms of his character. Making his character be believable and be a mad man as they wanted the audience to think. With his different laughs and facial expressions are what made it be so realistic, he was playing the part not just doing it. Although his accent was believable and mostly consistent there were a few times he lost it when getting quiet or loud with his voice. The actor showed he was confident on stage, reason for this is he got completely naked in front of a live
In conclusion, ineffective meetings can have a significant negative impact on an organization. That impact can range from a lack of knowledge due to inefficiencies, loss
Meetings take place at every organization just about every day. How each organization plans, executes and follows up on their meetings ultimately helps decide on how effective the group can be. As organizations conduct meetings, understanding obstacles such as the seven deadly sins of meetings, can help leaders and meeting planners circumvent potential issues and focus on creating positive meeting atmospheres. Focusing on number four in the seven deadly sins of meetings, nothing happens once the meeting ends, can greatly improve the positive momentum of most meetings. While meetings can have many hurdles, but with focus and action leaders can overcome obstacles by ensuring that action is being taken. Leaders and meeting facilitators can ensure action will be taken by understanding and following four simple steps.