The Lottery Ritual

745 Words2 Pages

The tradition of following particular notions and dogmas in our culture shape our role as individuals in society. In Shirley Jackson’s short story “The Lottery” we are introduced to the destructive influence that unchallenged or unquestioned dogma has on an entity's life and death in a community. In this paper I will engage in textual analysis with the purpose of demonstrating and comparing how Salman Rushdie’s outlooks of organized religion and its effect on society in his essay, “Imagine there’s No Heaven” compares to those implied in Jackson’s short story. “The Lottery,” conveys the argument of the endangerment in thoughtlessly following rituals in cultural society. In Rushdie’s essay he perceives these traditional followings of dogmatic …show more content…

Jackson uses a lot of irony throughout the story. The author begins the story explaining the villagers gathering in town for the lottery. The author misrepresents the actuality of this “lottery” to the reader. For instance she opens the story like this, “The people of the village began to gather in the square, between the post office and the bank, around ten o'clock; in some towns there were so many people that the lottery took two days and had to be started on June 27th but in this village, where there were only about three hundred people, the whole lottery took less than two hours, so it could begin at ten o'clock in the morning and still be through in time to allow the villagers to get home for noon dinner (Jackson).” Before we are aware of the type of lottery that’s going to take place, the arrangements and villagers themselves seem innocent. When in fact every year, the village “lottery” is something violent that concludes in a hostile murder, an eccentric habitual tradition that proposes the hazards of rituals that are obeyed irrationally by a …show more content…

Summers spoke frequently to the villagers about making a new box, but no one liked to upset even as much tradition as was represented by the black box.” Although falling apart and scarcely embodying a box anymore, the people appear to have boastfulness in the ceremonious lottery and have this forceful belief and certainty that the box’s necessity must not change. This forceful belief implies that the villagers fear change. They grasp securely to a fragment of the ritual that persist, horrified to modify even the most superficially irrelevant piece of it. Another example of where we are introduced to the damaging influence that unchallenged/unquestioned dogma has on an entity's life and death in a community is when half way through the story Jackson writes, “Although Mr. Summers and everyone else in the village knew the answer perfectly well, it was the business of the official of the lottery to ask such questions formally.” This occurred right before the drawing of the names, where Mrs. Dunbar is asked if her son, Horace, will be participating for the family in the absence of Mr. Dunbar. The question was meaningless and had no purpose besides “tradition” but it is still asked although everyone knows Horace is still too young to participate. Although certain measures of the ritual have changed such as wooden chips are now slips of paper, the people in the village have no regularity in what rules they deem to follow and cherry-pick which ones to remove

Open Document