The Kama Sutra

1423 Words3 Pages

What is Vatsyayana’s targeted demographic of readers when he wrote the Kama Sutra? Was it exclusive to the leisure class of the Indian society? Or did it also include the lower class? There is evidence that suggests that the text is biased for the aristocrats, as the practices described require time and money that the peasants don’t have. The fact that Vatsyayana is likely a member of the elite class, deduced from his sophisticated knowledge of Hinduism and what a nobleman’s day is like, could be another sign that his written work is biased towards the upper class. These facts lead to the question: if the Kama Sutra is partial to the aristocrats, did Vatsyayana retain the rudimentary principles of Hinduism throughout his work so that it could also be a valuable guideline for the lower class members? As much as the Kama Sutra seems to emphasize how extravagant a nobleman’s life should be, the essence of the book deeply intertwines its ideas with the three fundamental Hindu teachings that ultimately would be beneficial to the lower class too.

As a part of the Gupta Empire, Vatsyayana lived in a society that was heavily influenced by Hinduism, and this is portrayed by his stress on the basic teachings of Hinduism throughout the Kama Sutra. There is no doubt that he passionately values the ideas of dharma, kama, artha and moksha as shown in his writings, and urges all men to practice them, starting at a young age. Although he never deliberately points out whether the text is exclusively for the noble class or not, his writing shows traces of that confirms that it is all-class inclusive.

The teaching of dharma, as depicted in the Kama Sutra, also takes the lower caste into consideration. When answering to an objection as to why r...

... middle of paper ...

...n his text. He thinks of artha as a concept of investment and protection of your wealth, not necessarily as a matter of greed.

It is uncertain whether Vatsyayana may or may not be intentionally biased towards the more privileged class in his writings, but he unquestionably did not rule out the peasants from practicing the teachings within the Kama Sutra. Because the fundamental qualities of the Kama Sutra are derived from Hinduism, which stresses the principles of dharma, kama and artha, it could not exclude the lower class population. Vatsyayana has illustrated that wealth is not required for an individual to practice ideas that would help one to achieve moksha. Even with signs of disparity against the serfs, he still ultimately expresses the main three ideas of Hinduism so that the text would be a beneficial guideline for the lower class to practice as well.

Open Document