The Juxtaposition of Platonism and Marxism

756 Words2 Pages

The juxtaposition of Platonism and Marxism
Imagination, whishes, and dreams make up the paradises which are the foreground for the utopia one envisions as a youth or as a mature adult. Juxtaposed , is just that, a wise look into the mind of developed scholars in Platonism, versus the economic based utopia of Karl Marx. More precisely, we will be comparative and contrastive on the basic means of each ideal, how it effects the class system, how righteousness and truth bearing they are, and what the different ideals have culturally on the impact if these two utopias were carried out perfectly in a civilization.
Firstly, we will discuss the basic premise of each. Platonism eludes to the notion that “there is no higher purpose for man than a fearless pursuit of truth” (Magstadt 44). This constituent of Platonism is which the entire utopia or ideal is formed. However, Platonism also eludes to the fact that people are happier when they gain success unethically and this effects the class systems dramatically. This is true especially today when the poorest are forced to do everything right and just and the wealthy are using loop holes and finding illegal ways to get exponentially richer many times without penalty. Marxism, is based on the notion that the increasing scarcity of limited resources will cause more competitiveness and cause a classless political system or one class system.
Secondly, in regards to the class system, Plato’s system encases “a three class system – farmers and artisans, warrior-auxiliaries and philosopher guardians. Each excel in one of the three virtues to the ideal city-state: moderation (workers and artisans), courage( warrior- auxiliaries) , and wisdom (philosophers ). Only the ...

... middle of paper ...

...speaking. Marriage may even become obsolete and a matriarchal society could ensue since women are becoming more willing to work and have already have a lower unemployment rate even though they earn less salary.
In conclusion, these utopias are vastly different both in theory and in result. Both have positive components, negative components and uncertainties. Perhaps a classes society would be good initially then to form in to a Platonistic society with a new reign of more ethical leaders. Or perhaps a classes system with less government would be best if people could be less unethical and kind to one another for a great good or for god. Whatever the case may be the human race is inept at adapting or adjusting to their political habitat and both utopias may need to be utilized for political peace in the short term before a long term utopia is accepted in positivity.

Open Document