Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Housing choice voucher program essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Housing choice voucher program essay
Research clearly attests to the positive effect housing choice vouchers can have on academic achievement. In each of the case studies, implementation of the vouchers resulted in at least some improvement on children’s education and long-term career success, as compared to their previous situations. However, it is important not to overstate the significance of the vouchers’ success. Results of the MTO study demonstrate that a high number of Section 8 voucher holders only moved to slightly more affluent neighborhoods and well-performing schools. Further, additional variables originating in a child’s home, such as academic disadvantages caused by a lack of resources or parental involvement, will continue to thwart the ability of vouchers to cause …show more content…
for the specific purpose of help boosting the learning outcomes of disadvantaged children. Horton’s Kids began in Washington, D.C. and now serves more than 300 children, ages 3 to 18 (Horton’s Kids, 2016). Most of these children come from one of the most at-risk neighborhoods in the District, with a high violent crime rate and a high-school drop out rate of over 70%. To compensate for their low-performing schools, this program provides these children with one-on-one tutoring on all major subjects. Further, to help children recover emotionally from trauma that comes from living in a dysfunctional home and neighborhood, the program also offers personal counseling services. To help encourage family involvement, these centers meet with families each week to update them on their children’s progress so that the parents can get a better idea of their child’s academic strengths and weaknesses. This process allows parents to better discern how they can help ensure their children’s success (Reim, 2013). Recognizing the deficiency of library resources in disadvantaged children’s homes, the Horton’s Kids program focuses on improving children’s literacy rates. After assessing a child’s literacy proficiency, they created personalized education plans designed to meet each child’s individual needs. They also include access to a library stocked with books available for children to bring home. As a result, their 2016 report of this past school year revealed that 94% of children in their program achieved improvement in their literacy skills (Annual Report,
Use of School Vouchers There has been a lot of debate recently over the use of school vouchers. Voucher programs offer students attending both public and private schools tuition vouchers. It gives taxpayers the freedom to pick where their tax dollars go. In theory, good schools will thrive with money and bad schools will lose students and close its doors. Most people feel that taking taxpayer money from public schools and using this money as vouchers for private schools is a violation of the constitution.
School Choice: Followed the ruling on compulsory education. Parents have a right to choose whether their children go to a private, parochial or public school, or they may choose to home-school. Parents must accept any responsibility for their choice.
The National Center for Education Statistics estimates that 32 million adults cannot read. In New York City 25 percent of adults lack basic literacy skills, the number is even higher in some of the surrounding boroughs. When parents are illiterate it has a negative impact on quality of life, puts stress on the children they rely on for communication and inhibits the child’s educational success. Higher education correlates with greater income, better health, the improbability of committing crimes, likelihood to vote and contributes to the success of future generations. The majority of Literacy Partner’s parents improved a grade level or more during the 2014-2015 program year. Of Literacy Partners students taking the GED, seventy-six percent
Upon doing research, I have also read a few great pieces of literature that share some insight on successful literacy development and parental involvement aiding in that success. Lisa Delpit is an extraordinary author and educationalist who offers so much insight into the school systems and shares what works and does not work. I have had the pleasure of reading a few of her texts, but the one that fit this thesis best in her book called "Multiplication is for White People: Raising Expectations for Other People's Children". In chapter 3 of this book, Delpit discusses how learning does not just take place at school, but also does at home. At home learning is just as important as it is when it is being used in classrooms. Delpit (2013) states, "I have never presented myself as a reading researcher, only as a teacher who has "taught" reading. Yet, the more I explore research on reading, the more I realize that I understand our limited knowledge of what actually transpires during the learning-to-read process" (p. 60). Delpit is stating that many teachers and even parents only go by the book on
The overriding rationale for education vouchers is the simple fact that private schools are better than public schools and public schools are a disaster, creating an illusion. There is a wide assumption that private schools somehow increase educational equity, with the interpretation that all low-income children and minorities can take advantage of private education. What is not known about education vouchers is the way it uses private school as a scapegoat in order to avoid the real issues surrounding the problems of public schools. Private school choices only serve as an excuse because they only offer admission to a limited portion of low-income and minorities. The seats are limited, “all you are doing is making tiny adjustments in the allocation of educational opportunities for a very small number of children and still condemning a large number of children to poorly funded, inadequate schools” (Hammond 10). The histories of education vouchers go back to the 1776, when Adam Smith proposed that government give money to parents in order to diversify and up the competition in the classroom. Smith also concluded that because parents are the consumers, they should have the right to choose their children education. In the late eighteen century, Thomas Pain took Smiths concept to the United Sates, “the poor should be given special aid and parents should be required to purchase education for their children”. In 1859, John Stuart Mill contradicted Pain’s argument by imposing that government should require a minimum education for every child, but parents should have the option to seek education, how and wherever they wanted. By the 1800s there was a great influx of immigrants to the United States and public schools had to be readily ...
Most school vouchers are highly beneficial for low-income students. The government puts a specific amount of funding on a school voucher for parents to cover the full tuition for a public school education. Some families are financially burdened, so they cannot always send their kids to go to the best school. The school vouchers creates the opportunity to change that and improve education for all children. It encourages students to enroll in school, which increases graduation rates and standardized test scores. According to the text, the proponents believe the school voucher programs will be a huge success because it provides students with high-value products and advanced technologies to use in class. However, there are negative aspects associated
One of the primary reasons for parents choosing to send their child to a private school is due to the many pre-conceived notions that private schools carry regarding their overall reputations. There are three main misconceptions that will be addressed here. These misconceptions are: the misconception of parental choice in selecting a school; more qualified teachers with the most current teaching knowledge; and the myth that private schools are more successful than public schools.
...es their child’s literacy. As shown in the study Welcoming Families: A Parent Literacy Project in a Linguistically Rich, High-Poverty School when parents are raising their children in a bilingual home, it is often difficult to be sure of how to aid their children in reading activities, especially if they are unsure of how to read in English as well. Parents are shown to be one of the strongest influences on their children’s literacy development, and often they are in need of help by their local schools in order to be able to aid their children to the best of their abilities.
First, they argue government funding generally comes with government regulations. Though there is always the possibility the government could impose harmful regulations even without corresponding funding, it is true that voucher programs often entail significant regulations on private schools.
Scipio, V. (2006). Early Literacy Development in Minority, Middle-Class Families A Qualitative Research Study. Retrieved April 9, 2014, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491777.pdf
Today, charter schools and vouchers are still somewhat under debate. They are being argued in places from the local school board meetings to state supreme courts. Both are considered “school of choice” initiatives which allow parents to choose their child’s educational path outside the traditional public school system. The school voucher is a program which provides a certificate which is used to pay for education at the school of choice outside the public school system. Charter schools have been freed from rules, regulations, and statues with the responsibility of producing assured results that are set forth in the school’s charter. These (charter) schools are publicly funded. Choice is a God given
There are at least 9 million students from Kindergarten through 12th grade that cannot speak English. Also children that come from a single parent, or high poverty family is on the rise. 29% of caucasian children live in a high poverty, single parent family. 52% of children whom are either Hispanic or African American come from a high poverty, single parent family and teachers need to be aware of these situations. When a student walks through that classroom door, they expect to feel safe, and welcome, and that the teacher there is a person they can trust. (Saravia-Shore, 2008)
Children from low-income families face a dual problem of fewer educational advantages during their life. In Longs, South Carolina, a Catholic school exist which many parents send their children for the best education possible instead of public school. Schools across the United States have numerous difficulties of youth not attending and graduating high school. Parents either know of or have witnessed illegal activity within a vicinity of public schools. The literature that is provided to teach these children is not efficient and effective. Many low-income families have no choice in the matter because they cannot afford the fees for attendance to private schools. Some families have the opportunity of obtaining a voucher that helps pay for the tuition. Many see this voucher as a way of abandoning public school instead of trying to fix it. Whatever the advantages of education for young people, many are not attending school on a regular basis. Many studies have been done that confirm that there is a vast difference in academic performance between children from high and low-income communities. Education is necessary but education alone does not make it equal between the privilege and poor children as many think it should. Decreasing poverty and inequality first, will raise educational enrollment and performance of students to succeed without regard to their environment situations, race, and gender.
Reading instruction in the elementary school is critical to students’ success in school. Students leaving elementary school, not reading at grade level, have a much lower chance of graduating from high school. “A student who can't read on grade level by 3rd grade is four times less likely to graduate by age 19 than a child who does read proficiently by that time. Add poverty to the mix, and a student is 13 times less likely to graduate on time than his or her proficient, wealthier peer” (Hernandez, 2011).
Greene, Jay P.; Winters, Marcus A. When Schools Compete: The Effect of Vouchers on Florida Public School Achievement. New York, Center for Civic Innovation. 2003.