The Importance Of Morals In The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn

1017 Words3 Pages

At a very young age, children are exposed to values before they gain the ability to reason effectively and to think critically. Whenever they misbehave, their parents correct their behaviors by means of punishment. Therefore, a misbehaved child will associate their wrongdoings with a negative emotion, deterring them from performing the punished behavior. They also learn morality by absorbing the emotions of those around them in their environment, and as a result, their feelings and behaviors are shaped by what they observe. Additionally, individuals introspect their feelings to decide whether or not their actions are considered moral. If an action makes the individual feel guilty, then he or she will conclude that it is wrong. This could not …show more content…

Upon his encounter with Jim, Miss Watson’s slave, on Jackson’s Island, Huck learns that Jim has run off. However, having already promised Jim he would not report back to Miss Watson, Huck keeps his word, despite knowing that “‘people would call me a low down Abolitionist and despise me for keeping mum—but that don’t make no difference. I ain’t going to tell, and I ain’t going back there anyways’”(Twain 55). This quote not only depicts Huck as a man of his word, but it also goes to paint a bigger issue here in regards to a rising moral dilemma, one between Huck and society. He is raised during a period where slavery is ubiquitous; it is a period where whites are put up on a pedestal and blacks are repressed. Therefore, it is abnormal to think that any white man, or child for that matter, would choose not to break his word on a promise to a slave. To do so would mean that he is going against what his society upholds, marking this as one of Huck’s many moral dilemmas. However, that is not enough to discourage him from doing what he feels is right because not keeping a promise is the same as disrespecting himself and hurting his self-esteem. When Huck keeps his promise, it communicates to Jim that Huck values him because like Jim, Huck too, has run away. In that case, they are not different and Huck can relate to Jim. Huck continues to learn to respect and care for Jim, not as a runaway …show more content…

In his defense, “Pap always said it warn’t no harm to borrow things, if you was meaning to pay them back, sometime; but the widow said it warn’t anything but a soft name for stealing, and no decent body would do it” (75). Huck is morally conflicted because he has two different belief systems to choose from, forcing him to pick his battle and interpret what is right and wrong in his own terms. On the one hand, his dad genuinely believes that the stolen item is borrowed if the stealer has the intention of paying it back to the original owner. On the other hand, the widow argues that taking anything that has not yet been paid for is stealing; there is no such thing as borrowing in the given situation. This prompts Huck to establish his own middle ground and make a compromise between the two. He decides to choose three items that he would no longer borrow, and that puts him at ease. Upon closer examination, his decision is a critical one because it shows his moral position evolving. He does not follow any of the beliefs imposed on him by his father or the widow. In fact, he adopts a new system to live by, one that caters most to his values. Ultimately, Huck does more than defying society; he rejects the beliefs he has been brought up by, which gains him the ability to grow into his own system

Open Document