The Importance Of Food Neophobia

811 Words2 Pages

Food neophobia is regarded as the reluctance to eat, or the avoidance of new foods (Knaapila, 2007). In the ‘Development of a scale to measure the Trait of Food Neophobia in Humans’ (Pliner and Hobden, 1992) explore and research food neophobia, using behavioural validation studies in laboratory food selection situations. They did this by using a paper and pencil measure of trait of food neophobia. To fully justify their study it was critical to use content and construct validity in order to reinforce their findings. Construct validity refers to “validating” your constructs based on their pattern of correlations with other variables assumed to be indicators of or theoretically related to the construct of interest (Edwin, 2011). Pliner and Hobden …show more content…

This scale was created by using 27 students to whom food neophobia was informally described to. This enabled them to conclude that participants with high levels of neophobia were less likely to experience novel foods. From this scale, Pliner and Hobden also concluded that food neophobia was strongly correlated to general neophobia. Content validity also played a crucial role in this study as it enabled Pliner and Hobden to confirm how accurate their means of measuring food neophobia was. A large number of undergraduates participated in this study, which increased the level of content validity. In order to validate the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS) the participants were then shown an array of foods from a list of novel and familiar foods and were asked about their willingness to try the unknown foods. Strong correlations were found between reluctance to try novel foods and high levels of food …show more content…

Similarly, those who showed reluctance to unfamiliar situations also ranked higher in neophobia. Also it was found that adults were more willing to try novel foods than their younger counterparts. From this, it has been concluded that pre-exposure to food neophobia may reduce its levels as it decreases anxiety within a participant because they become more relaxed when faced with the prospect of trying something unfamiliar.

Evaluation of author’s interpretation One of the key conclusions that Pliner and Hobden formulated was that subjects who were exposed to a neophilic scale before the study was carried out were shown to have a much lower level in neophobia than those who weren’t exposed to the scale. However, it was also found that some participants who were found to be highly neophobic were unaffected by this exposure. From this, it can be deducted that early exposure to neophilic scales may not affect every subject, as the levels of neophobia varies from subject to subject. Further research into this result may discover how other variables affect inherited

Open Document