The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks, And De-Extinction

910 Words2 Pages

Technology is supposed to be seen as such an advancement and great accomplishment. What others may not always know is sometimes it isn’t all fun and games, it could be dangerous. As seen when we created the atomic bomb and guns, their only purpose is to destroy and cause pain to others. Although they are not always in use they are a constant threat to our well being. We need to take into consideration the positives and the negatives of the technology we create now in present day. Many people change their position on this overarching question: What responsibility do people have when developing new technology? In the texts “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley, “the Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, and “De-Extinction” answers the questions that it may impose. Each of these texts share one same belief: Society holds throughout the article she talks about how the HeLa helped created cures for various diseases, and how groundbreaking they are. But when diving further into her research she finds out that there was a face behind it all: Henrietta Lacks. When looking into it she discovers that Henrietta's family was never informed that her cells were used for scientific discoveries in this caused much hardship for her family. As seen when Rebecca states “ jet said the family was angry- angry that Henrietta's cells were being sold for twenty-five dollars of vial and angry that articles had been published about the cells without their knowledge (23)” In this quote it is seen that when not taking into consideration the effects that new technology, it can cause emotional pain. As seen when Henrietta's family wasn't informed of the use of her cells and publish articles on the subject. Although no one was physically hurt in this, being emotionally hurt can be just as

Open Document