Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It’s inevitable that there were countless similarities between The Hunger Games book and the movie, as the movie was based off the book. However, there were plenty of major differences that stood out in the movie in comparison to the book. In particular Peeta’s leg situation, the way characters died and lastly, how Katniss received various gifts. These changes were made in the movie, each with a specific purpose.
A significant portion of The Hunger Games are deaths, but more importantly how it happened. Suzanne Collins made the deaths of the tributes thrilling and exciting. In the book a character named Thresh from District 11 killed Clove, a career tribute from District 2 by hitting a rock against her head. However, in the film Thresh just hit Clove against the Cornucopia extremely hard. The reason for the rock being a factor of the death in the novel was to be more descriptive. The author’s job is to provide a vivid image in the reader's head. Hence, Suzanne Collins used an object to make the novel more engaging. In comparison, the film without the rock was intense. This is due to his action of killing the young tribute in order to help Katniss. Showing the film
…show more content…
In the Games tributes are able to receive gifts from sponsors if their mentors send them. In the book Katniss receives broth, burn medicine, bread from District 11, sleeping syrup and a basket of food. But in the movie Katniss only receives broth and burn medicine. Again, if the producers did show Katniss get all those gifts then they wouldn’t have enough time to show the Games, interviews and other main/important scenes that allowed the audience to comprehend the movie. Also in the book all the gifts adds valuable content that allows the readers to enjoy the book, since they don’t get to see outside the games. Although, Katniss didn’t receive all the gifts in the movie that she did in the book, the audience still got the objective of the gifts from
The movie The Hunger Games, originally based on a book by Suzanne Collins, is about a place called Panem, which is ruled by the Capitol and has 12 districts within it. These 12 districts are separated founded on their economic statuses, meaning the higher the district, the more impoverished the residents are. There are 2 tributes that are chosen to participate, forcibly, in The Hunger Games each year. Each competitor is instructed to eliminate one another in order to survive and come out on top. There is only one tribute allowed to come out of the arena alive. Katniss lives in District 12, which is the most impoverished district of them all, and she volunteers as tribute in “the Reaping” when her sister is chosen to participate. She and the other tribute from her district, Peeta, make it into the arena with the hopes that one of them comes out the winner and above all else, alive (Ross, 2012). I will refrain from going any further just in case you have not read the book or have not seen the movie. In terms of soci...
The Hunger Games are one of the most emotional, viscous and cruel books I’ve read before. But both heroes Katniss and Peeta have survived to live the next day. They are both winners and Katniss lives to feed her family once more. It was a fantastic book of amazing features, characters, themes and creativity.
A dystopian text often consists of a society that is based on a utopian ideal of a “perfect” society. Despite being a fictitious setting, the more realistic a dystopian text seems, the more disturbing it is for the audience. The novel The Handmaid’s Tale, written by Margaret Atwood, takes place in the Republic of Gilead that was formerly the state of Massachusetts. Massachusetts has been reformed to a place where puritan traditions and beliefs are the only customs allowed. Gilead and its totalitarian government oppress women to the extent where rape is a norm in their society. The novel The Hunger Games, written by Suzanne Collins, is about a contest held in the country of Panem, where twelve teenagers are forced to fight one another until only one survives the battle. The people of Panem are mandated in watching this contest, as a reminder of the previous uprising that was stopped by their totalitarian government called the Capitol. Atwood depicts Gilead in a way where it is almost possible for the society in Gilead to
There are many differences and similarities from the movie and book. For example, there was one part that didn't happen in the book this that when Davie was heading to the house of shaws there was two men pretending that one of the men was sick and needed sliver coins for medicine, you could see that the man was lying because he had a little bit of coins him self. This dint happen in the book and it gave the movie a
The first difference I saw in the Hunger Games was that people from different districts are not supposed to talk to each other, let alone go to another district. It was against the law to go to another district. Katniss did not like to talk to others anyway, just being by herself in the woods made her more comfortable. She did not like the socialization factor mostly because she thought she was not as good or as classy as the others. Her personality traits suffered as well, from not being more outgoing as a child. She thought as long as she kept to herself, she would be okay. Without these social connections, Katniss would have lost the key functions in our society today.
The Hunger Games do not provide a realistic glimpse into the lives of the tributes. The Capitol takes great pride with appearances and fashion, and this is reflected through the tributes. Every year the tributes are groomed and pampered by the Capitol’s chosen stylists for the Games in order for the tributes to be admired by the people of Panem before entering the arena. Katniss acknowledges this when she says, “What do these people do all day, these people in the Capitol, besides decorating their bodies and waiting around for a new shipment of tributes to row in and die for entertainment” (Collins, Hunger 65). The Games show a glamorized type of reality in order to entertain Panem. The tributes cannot win on strength and brutality alone; they must win the hearts of sponsors and citizens of the Capitol. The tributes transform in to celebrities to win the hearts of citizens before being killed on live television. Mary Matos in her article “Media in the Hunger Games”, she states that throughout the Hunger Games trilogy Katniss alternates between that awareness, understanding, and manipulation of the media (Matos 4). While Katniss is alternating between all of these she will never out of the media itself. Being a tribute she will always be juggling herself between these three
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
The Hunger Games is a great movie that connects to many emotions. The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins, is a movie about a girl (Katniss) whom has lived her whole life in constant hunger in the battle for food. She lives in the 12th distract out of 13 and all of the districts get together and have a televised broadcast of citizens ages 12-18 from each district fighting to the death over food for their district. In the end Katniss’ younger sister, Prim has been chosen to fight for her district, in the end Katniss volunteers as tribute (in place) of her younger sister. And then Katniss proceeds to promise her younger sister that she will win the games and return home to her family. There are many factors that play a role in making the hunger games a great movie, such as, the storyline, character development, the violence, and the idea of a film based on a dystopian society.
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
Both of them risked their lives for loved ones. They also had basically wars in the games it is Capitol vs Districts and in Romeo and Juliet it is Montague - Capulet feud. They both are star - crossed lovers. In both books and movies there were many deaths. I didn’t really see any comparison between The Hunger Games and Romeo and Juliet before but then I found many things that are similar. The things I would change would be that there was a lot of deaths so I would shorten the amount of deaths. I felt that Peeta has done a lot of things for Katniss so she should repay Peeta of the kind deeds he has done. I didn’t really like how he joined hands with the Careers even though he was saving Katniss he should have thought of something else to protect Katniss. Even though I want Katniss and Peeta to survive and win the game I think it was unfair that only on district can win. I thought that if it was 2 different people it would have been fair to the people who was fighting on their own since their partner already died. The book would have been better if Peeta told Katniss how he felt the moment he realized he loved
The novel Anthem by Ayn Rand and the movie The Hunger Games directed by Francis Lawrence and Gary Ross are popular among teens because they can relate to them by the high expectations put upon them. In a dystopian novel or movie, there is a dystopian protagonist. A dystopian protagonist is someone who often feels trapped, struggles to escape, questions existing systems, believes or feels as if something is wrong in the place they live in, and then helps the audience realize the effects of dystopian worlds. These are both good examples because it takes us on a walk through the protagonist's life and only then do we see what dystopian really is.
... effects that it has on children growing up. Katniss grew up in a district that had little to no resources so she learned to make best of what she had from the early ages that’s why she had greater advantage over the other contributors from other districts. I have read the book and seen the movie as well and the main difference that I would have to note would have been the pace of the deaths, in the movie the deaths were much quicker while in the book it was more detailed and seemed longer between each death of a tribute. As well as the graphic descriptions of the mutated monster that was formed from the dead diseased tributes never really was shown in the movie. Im kind of upset that there are so many good parts from the book that is missing in the movie. That’s why I would advise anyone that wants to watch this to read the book first before watching the movie.
“The Hobbit” written by J.R.R Tolkien and movie director Peter Jackson, both has different moods. The title of the book “The Hobbit” is an interesting title because it grabs the reader’s attention which leads to more people reading it. The movie has showed way more detail than the book, because the movie had showed lighting, sounds, angles, and framing. The book tells us what is happening but we don’t know what sounds were used and if the framing is a close up or a long shot. Jacskon’s changes in the movie were more effective.
Also in the games Katniss found out Peeta really loved her but she didn't really know what she felt for him. After the game maker announced that there would be a rule change in which two tributes from the same district is allowed to win. This led to Kat...
I love the Hunger Games book; however, I was very dissapointed when I saw the movie. They left a lot of important details and information out and just the overall movie was a dissapointment. For example, during the games Katniss finds Peeta slowing bleeding to death and brings him to a cove to help him. This is shown in the movie but the most important part the left out is when Katniss starts to open up to Peeta. This is the part in the book where she truly starts to care for him. Comparing this book to the movie is like comparing a delicious dessert to some