The Human Rights Act

3571 Words8 Pages

The Human Rights Act The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates into domestic law the ECHR to which the UK has been committed since 1951. The Act modernises relationships between people and the State. The Act has brought huge responsibilities across the UK and one such responsibility is with regards to Article 2(the protection of the right to life) & Article 3(No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment). Article 2 & 3 imposes on the State positive obligations in that the securing of certain conventional rights can only be achieved by State action to regulate certain types of conduct. Article 2 is one of the 'most fundamental provisions in the Convention' as it 'not only safeguards the right to life but sets out the circumstances when the deprivation of life may be justified.'[1] The State's obligation is not confined to the duty to refrain from unlawful killing and to investigate suspicious deaths; it also extends to the State to take steps to prevent the avoidable loss of life. In LCB v. UK, for the first time the Court recognised that Article 2(1) not only refrains the State from the intentional and unlawful taking of life, but also imposes a duty on the State to take appropriate stops to safeguard the lives of individuals within the jurisdiction. The Court was prepared to examine, an application regarding circumstances that did not result from use of force by the agents of the State. The applicant had developed leukaemia, which she claimed was because of her father being exposed to radiation whilst serving in the military, claiming that the absence of information and monitoring of her heal... ... middle of paper ... ... [3] X v. FRG app., 1984. [4] X v. UK (1978)14 DR 31. [5] A national Health Service Trust v. D & Ors (2000) TLR 19/7/2000. [6] 'Judge confirms patient's right to die'. The Guardian, 7th October 2000. [7] LCB v. UK Appl. No. 234113/94(1998), The Times, 15 June 1998. [8] NHS Trust A. NHS Trust A v M and NHS Trust B v H [2001]. [9] (App. 33394/96), Judgment of 10th July 2001. [10] Tanko v. Finland, 1994. [11] D v UK [1997] 24 EHRR 423. [12] See footnote 5. [13] Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437. [14] X v FRG (1984) 7 EHRR CD 152. [15] X v Germany. [16] East African Asians v. UK, 1981. [17] Hurtado v Switzerland (1994). [18] See the A v UK judgment of 23rd September, 1998. [19] Al-Adsari v UK. [20] Osman case. [21] Like in the case of Akkoac v Turkey.

Open Document