Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How has liberalism influenced international economic relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1968, Karl Polanyi argued that ‘ the human economy... is embedded and enmeshed in institutions, economic and noneconomic’. To some extent, this argument can be used to support the issues raised in an article published in ‘the Guardian’. The article was in relation to the slowing down of china’s economy, and the implications that would inevitably affect developing and emerging markets around the world. Polanyi’s argument can assist in understanding why a Chinese slow down has occurred, and the extent in which it will affect global economies. The article raises many questions such as why china’s economy is so important in global economics, and what implications could take place if china’s economy gets worse.
The aim of this essay is to provide
…show more content…
Economic liberalism is described as ‘the belief that both national societies and the global economy can and should be organized through self-regulating markets’ (Block 2001, xviii). Other aims of economic liberalism are using ‘laissez faire’ methods and the principle of free trade . Polanyi somewhat pushed for a more humane and rational structure and sought to rebuild the market society from its foundations . He reasoned that a society could fall victim to economic downturns with the rapid rise of a market economy (Litao 2013, 158). The article supports this view as it stated that china’s annual growth rate is at 6.8%, which may seem impressive for other global economies, but is however the weakest it has been in 25 years. This demonstrates that overtime, a economy cannot continually achieve certain targets. The increase of weak exports, slow investment and overcrowding in factories are a major concern for global investors .
Polanyi’s book is important in understanding the factors for China’s slow down as it provides insight into Polanyi’s concept of embeddedness. Polanyi argued that an economy needed to be understood alongside the social world in which it was embedded . He believed that an economy was made up of specific organisations, institutions and social structures, and thus need to be analysed as a whole. The term embeddedness
…show more content…
249). The article illustrates this point with the mention of various institutions that have become embedded and connected within china. The article mentions an institution called ‘Davos’ in which the global elite gathered to discuss the future of china’s slowing economy. Another institutions worth mentioning is the politburo, which is a committee mainly involved in creating policies for communist parties. These institutions are important as they support Polanyi’s view of institutions becoming enmeshed within a society. The mention of many institutions throughout the article emphasises the way in which institutions become embedded within a
Throughout history, many different types of economic models and theories have been developed. These different philosophies of business often were an important and integral part of a government’s basic structure. For example communist countries like China and the Soviet Union practiced a type of socialism. While, democratic nations like the United States and Canada practice forms of capitalism. Also within these economic models exists different theories as well such as Keynsian economics and laissez faire economics. To understand how these types of economies work in the world today, it is important to study and define a variety of economic systems. Researching such economic systems as capitalism and socialism, and also looking at the ideas of laissez faire and the Keynsian economics, a person will start to have a better understanding of how business works in the world today.
Huang, Y. (1999). The Last Steps Crossing the River: Chinese Reforms in the Middle of the East Asian Financial Crisis. New York: Graduate School of Business, Columbia University.
Since 1978, this aforementioned economic growth has been occurring under a communist government (Dellios). China operates in a system described as “socialism with Chinese characteristics”, a common theme in this country’s rise in the modern world (Dellios). Correspondingly, according to Rosita Dellios, Chinese communists adopted this political regime under Mao Zedong, which led to its economic revolution in the 20th century. This formula proved successful as it initiated the Chinese Communist Party, amending China’s interior chaos (Dellios). Therefore, China’s communist control did not negatively affect China’s economic growth, as communism rehabilitation drove this country into modernization in the 21st century.
In 2008, the Global Financial Crisis broke out; both the American economy and the economy in the West suffered a hard blow. However, a big economy system in the East emerged unexpectedly. China is now able to challenge the America’s decades-long dominant position in economic area. Started during the middle of 1990s, China’s manufacturing industry developed rapidly that billions of exports were floating out, and China was given the title of “the world’s factory”(BBC). By the end of 2010, China with a GDP of $5.8 trillion, surpassed Japan’s GDP of $5.48 trillion, became the world’s second largest economy system (BBC). China also exceeded Japan became America’s largest foreign securities holder. Since then, China has been seen as the US’s biggest opponent in economic field. Some economists even say that in 10 years, China will be the same size as the US economy. No matter whether China is going to reach the US’s economy size in 10 years or not, after forty years since the US first opened trade with China in 1972, America’s economy gradually relies on China’s economy and will collapse without the strength of China’s market.
With its 4,000 skyscrapers in the financial capital, Shanghai, and the ever rapidly growing economy, China might just do more than “catch up” to the United States. It may seem ironic that the country that has a replica of our “42nd st” would also be in growing competition with our economy and it may also seem like China is the “little brother” of the US, but how long will this go on for? Will the US be able to keep up soon enough? This is the direction China seems to be headed for. But what makes China the greatest exporter of goods in the world? Bartlett, a businessman Peter Katel refers to in his article, states that “the unbeatable china price is due not only to low labor costs but also to unethical trade practice.” According to the 2005 article, Congress has yet to approve more than a dozen pieces of legislation that would allow the yuan ¥ to “float” in world currency markets, allowing for free-market forces to establish its value.
...ted in the world. Chinese currency markets were not unified until 1994. China resolutely refused to open its financial markets to foreigners, again until very recently. Most striking of all, China achieved its transformation without adopting private-property rights, let alone privatizing its state enterprises” (Rodrick). China's central government and its leaders were practical enough to understand the role that private incentives and market liberalization could play in producing results. However, “they were also smart enough to realize that the solution to their problems lay in institutional innovations suited to the local conditions—the household responsibility system, township and village enterprises, special economic zones, partial liberalization in agriculture and industry—rather than in off-the-shelf blueprints and Western rules of good behavior” (Rodrick).
As these economic reforms led to China's accelerating economic growth, they also led to increasing political and economic decentralization where local regional governments made economic decisions, used tax revenue for local projects and received less financial support from the central government(Goldman & Mcfarquhar 2000, p.8). As explained by social scientist Gordan White, he characterized the social changes in post-Mao economic reforms as 'fragmented and fragmenting' (Goldman & Mcfarquhar 2000, p.17) The introduction of market forces as well as political and economic devolution of power to the local governments had produced serious social unrest to the Chinese's society. For example, the economic decentralization of the central government to the local government contributed to the alliances between the local officials and local enterprises. Although it improved the standard of living, this kind of alliance gave rise to corruption and enrich the local officials with power, giving them ultimate control ( Goldman & Mcfarquhar 2000, p.17). Due to economic interest of local authorities, they ignore the central government warning against corruption, labour exploitation and taxes overcharges. For example, due to the dual-price policy in products, it provides opportunities for people who have access to state-controlled goods and materials to make huge profits by buying them at an officially-fixed low price and reselling them at free market at a higher price (Minami 1994 , p.21). This shows that local government do not obey government rules and corruption in government is evident and inevitable. The central government failed to realise that although economic and political decentralization did improve market economy, it would on the ot...
“In 2010, the prestigious Nemmers Prize in Economics, awarded biennially to recognize work of lasting significance, was given to Helpman for fundamental contributions to the understanding of modern international economics and the effects of political institutions on trade policy and economic growth” (Clement, 2012). “The Mystery of Economic Growth” that was written by Elhanan Helpman provides a non-technical description of growth economics over the last half of a century. This paper will connect theory to data of four major countries United States, French, Australia, and Japan. The principle that emerges from “The Mystery of Economic Growth” is that long term growth comes from innovation and adoption of technology in an economy. Four
...conomy and capitalist ideals, China was fast to prosper into one of the strongest economies in the world. The staggering rate of annual growth and unmistakably favorable outlook of the Chinese economy not only serves to threaten power-holding countries in this world, but also proves that economic reform is possible without an extensive change in regime.
According to Polanyi, a market economy becomes a market society when all land, labour and capital are commodified (Polanyi, 1957). A market society is a structure, which primarily focuses on the production and distribution of commodities and services. This takes place through a free market system, which allows the opportunity for individuals to engage themselves in the market place, through trucking, bartering or exchanging. Polanyi’s fundamental idea of a market society is that all social relations are rooted in the economy as opposed to the economy being submerged in social relations.
From the 1970s, there has been a wave of liberalization in China, which was introduced by Deng Xiaoping. This is one of the key reasons to the rise of China to be one of the economic giants in the world. In the last 25 years of the century, the Chinese economy has had massive economic growth, which has been 9.5 percent on a yearly basis. This has been of great significance of the country since it quadrupled the gross domestic product (GDP) of the country thus leading to saving of 400 million of their citizens from the threats of poverty. In the late 1970s, China was ranked twentieth in terms of trade volumes in the whole world as well as being predicted to be the world’s top nation concerning trading activities (Kaplan, 53). This further predicted the country to record the highest GDP growth in the whole world.
Zhao, S., (2003), ‘Political Liberalization without Democratization: Pan Wei’s proposal for political reform’ Journal of Contemporary China, 12(35): 333–355.
Globalization is not a new concept – trade, migration, market integration and capital flows have been practiced in various forms dating back centuries. China is at the epicenter of our globalized world and their success is attributed to the tenets of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. However, opponents of the globalization believe if Smith were alive today, he would be repulsed by our modern day international business strategies. The general consensus among dissenters of globalization is the misguided belief that capitalism at any level is missing the moral sentiment espoused by Smith’s philosophical viewpoints. Even though Adam Smith would acknowledge that some Chinese citizens are casualties of globalization, he would conclude the economic development of China’s poverty stricken society unequivocally raised their standard of living.
The question posed is best explored through the lens of Modernization Theory, which partly originated with Lipset's 1959 formulation that the prospects for democracy to thrive within a country are directly correlated to its level of economic development. Przeworski has elucidated Lipset's theories as hypothesizing that economic affluence dovetails with democracy because wealth reduces the intensity of group or individual conflicts over the distribution of resources. Democracy – which through representative rule is perceived as the most egalitarian form of government – is widely taken to be the fundamental criterion of what makes a country or nation-state 'modern'. Lipset proposes that economic development sets off a series of profound social changes, such as increased urbanization, education and communication, that in turn precipitate larger middle classes and greater social equality. All of these elements combined, Lipset contends in his 1963 award-winning book, Political Man, provide the necessary framework for the emergence of democratic institutions. Today China maintains all such socio-economic elements. Thus, we are presented with a conundrum of sorts. Either we must construe that Modernization theory is dead, or according to its principles, that China’s democratization is latent, and will materialize at a later date.
In the race to be the best, China is clearly outperforming the United States. China has strong economic fundamentals¬ such as “a high savings rate, huge labor pool, and powerful work ethic” (Rachman, Gideon. "Think Again: American Decline). Their economy has grown an astonishing 9-10% over the past thirty years; almost double of what it used to be decades ago. China is also the “world’s greatest manufacturer and its greatest market” (Rachman). The continuing growth of China's economy is a source of concern for not only the U.S. but surrounding nations as well. One could argue that the U.S. need not worry about China’s growth because of the spread of globalization and that western ideologies would influence China to turn to democracy. Yet China has still managed to “incorporate censorship and one party rule with continuing economic success” (Rachman) and remains a communist country. Hypothetically, even if China does resort to a democratic state, this does not gua...