The Handmaids Tale Analysis

1584 Words4 Pages

Whose Choice is it Really? In Margaret Atwood's story, “The Handmaid’s Tale”, the main character, Offred, believes she is making a lot of decisions about her body for herself, just like the character Jig in Ernest Hemmingway's short story, “Hills Like White Elephants”. In order to really understand the process of decision making in these two stories, the reader has to understand that the characters in the stories don't realize that a lot of their decisions about their bodies are coming from different people and pressures, and not themselves. Both stories have dialogue that implies each character is acting on their own decision about their bodies. In “The Handmaid’s Tale”, Rita is talking to Cora in the kitchen behind Offred’s back about what …show more content…

In “The Handmaid’s Tale”, there’s a colossal pressure for Offred to conform with everyone else’s “choices”, similar to what Jig endures in Hills Like White Elephants. In “The Handmaid’s Tale”, the new government forces the women to conform. Offred states, “My name isn't Offred, I have another name, which nobody uses now because it's forbidden” (Atwood 84). The government not only took away the women’s names, but they make them all dress the same, to make them all into one person. They are not actively conforming to peer pressure, but being forced to wear certain clothes and told how they need to act. In Hills Like White Elephants, one of the reasons Jig decides to go through with the operation, is because, “You don’t have to be afraid. I’ve known lots of people that have done it.” Then Jig says, “So have I, and afterwards they were all so happy” (Hemmingway). The man in the story is using peer pressure as a way of convincing Jig to get an abortion. There seems to be a little bit of sarcasm, or distance when she says, “And afterwards, they were all so happy.” Jig’s statement makes it seem like the couples Jig and the man know, who went through with their abortions were not happy at all, and they most likely broke up or had lots of problems in their relationship afterwards. Most couples in real life who have abortions are …show more content…

The government specifically makes it so that people stay afraid in Gilead, so that the people don’t go against them. None of the handmaids are told what is going on, in the world, or even in their own Republic of Gilead. After the Prayvaganza, Ofglen reveals to Offred that lots of them know that she is seeing the commander in private, she asks Offred to “Find out and tell us … anything you can” (Atwood 223). The handmaids aren’t told anything about the world news, so they try to find any information out that they can. That is crucial to the republic controlling their bodies. If they think that they cannot challenge the government, and take back control of the choices being made about their bodies, then they won’t, because they fear that they will lose, and be sent to the colonies, or killed. They don’t know what happens after either of those situations, so they’d rather endure the oppression, rather than risk going into the unknown. In Hills Like White Elephants, Jig is afraid of what might happen to her if she gets an abortion. She shows worry when she says, “No, it isn’t. And once they take it away, you never get it back” (Hemmingway). Jig is afraid of a missed opportunity, and she is stuck on the “what if” of her decision. “What if” something goes wrong, “what if” she misses the baby too much, “what if” the man doesn’t love her anymore? These, and many more questions

Open Document