The book I chose to read for this independent reading project was The Gunslinger, by Stephen King. In a setting like Old West-styled stories, but with supernatural elements, it follows a man named Roland Deschain - who is more often referred to as the Gunslinger - and his quest involving hunting and capturing a man known as the Man in Black. While the reader isn’t enlightened as to why the Gunslinger is chasing the Man in Black, reason is given to believe that the Man in Black is evil. On his journey, he firsts stops in a small town called Tull, where the Man in Black had passed through - he brings a dead man back to life, and all in the town become so awestruck by him that they refuse to believe he has malintent. After the Gunslinger spends …show more content…
As he walks through the desert that the Man in Black did also, he finds himself soon forgetting about Tull - as if he’s used to the Man in Black’s tests of him - and also in declining health. So, when he sees what appears to be the Man in Black standing in front of a building, he approaches it quickly, but then sees that his eyes have deceived him, and faints from exhaustion. When he wakes, he finds that the figure he was not the Man in Black, but not a mirage, either - a young boy named Jake Chambers supplies the Gunslinger with some food and water, and when he explains to the Gunslinger that he doesn’t remember how he got in this house in the desert anymore, the Gunslinger is suspicious - but pitying the child, he takes him with him on his journey. Jake says he’s been visited by the Man in Black, and unlike a child usually would in the desert, he holds up well in the cruel conditions and remains fairly strong, causing the Gunslinger to consider if Jake, too, is a test for him to take, formulated by the Man in …show more content…
Some of the words were associated with the Gunslinger’s quest to find the Man in Black - Interloper is what he was called by the townspeople of Tull for demonizing the Man in Black, and this was what forced him to kill everyone in Tull with his bullets. After this ordeal in Tull, he must continue his quest to find the Man in Black in the desert - where he is met with more tests, and also faces treacherous dehydration. In addition, some words are used that are part of High Speech, which the Gunslinger can speak - ‘ka-tet’ refers to a group of people with the same destiny or goals, ‘thankee-sai’ means ‘thank you, sir’, and ‘howken’ refers to the act of hypnotizing someone with hand tricks. As it is the Gunslinger’s main motif, the word cloud is, fittingly, in the shape of a
In On Writing’s section titled “On Writing,” Stephen King iterates multiple times, his true feelings for writing by telling his story. The central point that he uses to say that writing is his passion and what he truly feels joy in is how he writes. King at one point says, “When I am writing, it is all the playground…”(King 149), this is the best example of how he translates his feelings. He uses the playground as a metaphor to intensify the joy he gets from writing, as a playground or park is something we can all relate to. It is not just that one quote, but it is also his tone as a whole, rather than being some distanced writer not showing emotion, he creates a tone of a proud father, pushing a child to love what he does, and not to take it for granted. King accomplishes this tone by giving small tips and tricks that he has used over the years, almost as a mentor to give the sense as it is not just a book, but a guide to becoming a better
Again Jake plays the role of the hero is when he saves young Culver from becoming utterl...
one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it is a sin to
Elie and Liesel live and survive during the time of World War II. Both characters face the harsh reality of the terrible period of time they are living in. The memoir, Night and the movie, “The Book Thief” share similarities and dissimilarities that make Elie and Liesel both stand out. Due to the loss of family, determination to live, and fear helps both of them survive the war, but depends on the different reactions, mistreated for different reasons, and hope.
After reading an essay, ‘On Writing’ by Stephen King, I was highly interested in King’s opinion about the necessity of reading and writing frequently in order to become a good writer. In King’s essay he talks about how he does not read to study and that he simply reads just to read; however, King does point out that though he is not reading to study there is still a learning process happening with everything he reads. “Every book you pick up has its own lesson or lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones.” (King) Why does King have this opinion about books?
In the short story “The Reach,” Stephen King addresses the fact that in life there is a constant fear of death, but when confronted with it is easier to accept when someone has seen many deaths and knows that they are dying themselves. The narrator of the story knows that she is dying and, being an elder, has seen many deaths. We reach this conclusion when she questions the love she has for others and no longer cries when others die around her anymore. She has seen many deaths in the years and can only accept that death is inevitable and a part of life. Mostly everyone she grew up with has passed on already.
Many people think that reading more can help them to think and develop before writing something. Others might think that they don’t need to read and or write that it can really help them to brainstorm things a lot quicker and to develop their own ideas immediately (right away). The author’s purpose of Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, is to understand the concepts, strategies and understandings of how to always read first and then start something. The importance of this essay is to understand and comprehend our reading and writing skills by brainstorming our ideas and thoughts a lot quicker. In other words, we must always try to read first before we can brainstorm some ideas and to think before we write something. There are many reasons why I chose Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, by many ways that reading can help you to comprehend, writing, can help you to evaluate and summarize things after reading a passage, if you read, it can help you to write things better and as you read, it can help you to think and evaluate of what to write about.
The Dark Tower – Stephen King The Dark Tower is a series of stories that follow the main character, Roland "The Last Gunslinger", as he travels across a harsh desert on a mission to find the "man in black". His mission is to make it safely to the Tower in order to save himself and the very existence of the universe. The entire series revolves around the tower and how essential it is. The tower is a central point where different planes of existence merge and if Roland doesn't make it there before it gets destroyed then everything else will be destroyed along with it.
I hated Roland in The Gunslinger by Stephen King because of all the horrible things he does to others along his journey. Roland is followed throughout the book in his journey across the desert to find the dark tower. I learned to watch out for people who will do anything to reach their goal like Roland does. The novel first follows Roland when he is telling Brown a story “in the middle of the deserted main street.
I think that Chris is a very motivated person. He knows what he wants and he is willing to do anything to get there. This quote describes when Gallien was trying to persuade Chris not to go through with his hitchhiking plan, “But he wouldn’t give an inch. He had an answer for everything I threw at him” (Krakauer 7). This quote shows the depth of his motivated character because of his unwillingness to change his mind. Additionally, I also think that Chris has a very optimistic character and outlook on life. Chris is not willing to totally accept the danger of what he is about to do because he is quick to hope for the best. Proof of this character trait can be found in the following quote, “‘I’m absolutely positive… I won’t run into anything I can’t deal with on my own’” (Krakauer 7).
“Young Goodman Brown”, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, delves into the classic battle between good and evil; taking the protagonist, Goodman Brown, on a journey to test the resolve of his faith. Goodman ventures out on his expedition deep into the sinister forest, in order to repudiate the attempt of the devil to sway him from Christianity; a test he believes his devout faith is prepared to confront. Goodman Brown is forever altered in ways unforeseeable by taking a stroll with the ultimate antagonist, the devil himself. The prevailing theme in this literary work, which is common in Hawthorne’s gothic writing, is the realization that evil can infect people who seem perfectly respectable. Throughout the course of his journey, Goodman Brown discovers that even highly reputable people of Salem are vulnerable to the forces of darkness.
"Why did Goodman Brown leave his wife to fulfill an evil purpose?" "What was his evil purpose?" "Who did he meet in the woods?" "Was it a dream or was it reality?" These are just a few of the questions that ran through my head after reading the short story, Young Goodman Brown. After several nights of reading, rereading, thinking, and debating I've received many revelations of this story; one being the true identity of the "fellow-traveler" mentioned throughout this adventurous tale. You see, he was not just any man, he was the devil himself.
Goodman Brown in the short story “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne goes on a journey into the woods to meet a stranger which ultimately changes his life. His blind faith in his religion makes him believe that all people are good. Goodman Brown is a trusting, naive man in the beginning if the story but witnesses a witch ceremony that changes his personality drastically. Seeing his family and his neighbors taking part in the sinful act changes his outlook on life and his outlook on their personalities as well. Brown’s blind faith in people and his naivety make the shock of what he sees in the woods turn him into an untrusting, paranoid man.
Into the Wild, a novel written by Jon Krakauer, as well as a film directed by Sean Penn, talks about Chris McCandless, a young individual who set out on a journey throughout the Western United States, isolating himself from society, and more importantly, his family. During his travels, he meets a lot of different people, that in a way, change his ways about how he sees the world. There are many characteristics to describe McCandless, such as “naïve”, “adventurous”, and “independent”. In the book, Krakauer described McCandless as “intelligent”, using parts in his book that show McCandless being “intelligent”. While Krakauer thinks of McCandless as being “intelligent”, Penn thinks of McCandless as a more “saintly” type of person.
The novel ends with Jake in the pits of disillusion. He breaks ties with all friends unceremoniously. He has unfulfilled sexual desires, and the realization that he has misplaced his love in Brett grips him to the core. Yet these bitter realities, these dark bottoms of the ocean may be the saving gems he would need to regain his lost self, the very important guideposts that he would need to touch to be able to rise to the surface of the sea, to be able to see the light again and ultimately to know his true self again. Similarly if he Jake is the personification of the Lost Generation, it might just be that this utter disillusionment might be the very forces that would impel the Lost Generation to find itself once more and rise again.