Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An Eassay Writting On The Pandemic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An Eassay Writting On The Pandemic
Along with prompting mass hysteria amongst people, the flu epidemic of 1918 also revealed the arduous aspects of scientific research. In order to efficaciously perform their jobs, scientists are required to possess specific attributes. In a passage from The Great Influenza, John M. Barry uses vivid imagery, figurative language and exemplification to depict the challenges and uncertainty a scientist must overcome, along with the traits they must bear in order to succeed in forming a “path” for future growth.
In order to illustrate the advancement and benefits that are created by continuous scientific research, Barry uses imagery. The use of imagery allows the reader to further understand and process the message the writer is trying to convey. Barry emphasizes the idea that once a discovery is made others will follow suit, “if the researcher succeeds, a flood of colleagues will pave roads over the path laid, and
…show more content…
Barry depicts the work of a researcher to be complex and challenging, and that each synopsis of a situation has obstacles that can only be surpassed by the necessary characteristics of a scientist. Barry uses the examination of a rock to show the mindset a scientist must have in order to obtain the wanted information. Including how researchers use the traits of not only curiosity and creativity, but also patience and forethought strengthens Barry’s claim of the predicaments a scientist may encounter and how he would overcome them, “Would a pick be best, or would dynamite be better - or would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive?” (Barry 40-42). Throughout the passage Barry uses several rhetorical strategies to characterize his claims and to allow his audience to grasp an understanding of how scientific research, although difficult and riddled with obstacles, encompasses humankind’s need for
Albert Einstein declared, “The most important thing is to never stop questioning.” Questions help extend our knowledge by opening our minds to change and new possibilities. The excerpt talks about the mindset that scientists need to become successful and the process they go through to make new discoveries. In The Great Influenza, John M. Barry educates citizens of the everyday challenges that scientists face through utilizing rhetorical questions, cause and effect, and contrast.
Barry states with comparing scientists to hard working’s men. Scientists can work long hard hours on only one single project the way a hard worker at a construction
In The Great Influenza by John M. Barry, the author writes about scientists, and their constant struggle with research. Barry emphasizes the difficult challenges, and mysteries people in the science occupation experience. The author also explains the qualities one must possess to be a scientist, and the all-or-nothing research they must partake in. Throughout this passage of The Great Influenza by John M. Barry, the author characterizes scientists, and their everyday research as spontaneous and unpredictable through the use of several rhetoric strategies.
In his webisode entitled ‘Alton’s Syrup Primer’, Alton Brown presents various types of syrups with a wide range of properties as an introduction to their uses in baking. As he begins to talk, one of his most noticeable characteristics is that his pace is distinctly faster than the average conversation; he maintains this throughout the entire clip. Also of note is his posture: bent in half with his elbows resting on the table, leaning forward towards the camera. Alton Brown’s pace and body language are tools that he uses in order to keep the viewer engaged and comfortable. Because the video is meant to be instructional - as evident by the use of the word ‘Primer’ in its title - its intrinsic goal is to inform, and if the viewer is engaged then
First, John M. Barry constructs vivid imagery to emphasize the trials and difficulties that life throws at people. People experience trial and error when choosing the best way to go about an issue. Scientist use this method when working on their labs and experiments. The author states, “If the rock is impenetrable, if dynamite would destroy what one is looking for, is there another way of getting information about what the rock holds?” (Barry 5). Barry develops the purpose of the excerpt by being very descriptive when
John M. Barry wrote The Great Influenza, where he accounted the 1918 flu epidemic as well as the scientists and their research. Barry’s purpose is to legitimize the work previous scientists have done. Barry wrote this using strong rhetorical devices including: Anaphora, Literary Allusion, and Rhetorical questions. He creates an accusatory tone in order to imply that future scientists will overlook the hard work the current and previous scientists of his time.
The influenza pandemic of 1918 had not only altered the lives of thousands, but the habitual lives of family and work as well. The Spanish Influenza collected more lives than all of the casualties of war in the twentieth century combined. After the disease had swept through the nation, towns that once began their days in lazy, comfortable manners had begun to struggle to get through a single day. What started as a mild neglect of a typical fever or case of chills had escalated and grown at an alarmingly rapid rate to be fearsome and tragic.
A passionate scientist is one who works with diligence and puts everything they have¬¬¬ into the work they are doing. A passionate scientist may not be the smartest, but they manage to intertwine emotional intensity and logic in an intricate way to work towards a goal that will make the world a better place. In Forty Signs of Rain, Frank Vanderwal adopts all these characteristics through a personal paradigm shift, one that parallels the paradigm shift he claims is a necessity for science if it was to continue to work for the good of humanity.
In the text, “Vaccines Cause Children More Adverse Reactions Than Any other Drug”, the author Dr. Mercola states his personal opinion as well as other doctors opinions are findings to help his research. The authors’ purpose is to inform the reader how vaccines are causing adverse reactions around the world. The author uses ethos throughout the piece because everyone he speaks with is a doctor, as well as him. His ethos makes the piece very informational and helpful to a parent reading who is concerned about vaccinating their kids. Dr. Mercola uses pathos by explaining all the harm vaccinations are doing, such as serious reactions and death. The piece has many logos informing readers’ studies being done on vaccinations, “based on reported pediatric
It is not the intent of this essay to investigate whether Dreiser, Zola, London or other Naturalists practiced these methods successfully within the context of the novel. It is clear however, that Norris did not. Mcteague may successfully incorporate the observatory and explanatory elements of the Scientific method as well as other nuances of the Naturalistic genre; however, his study is worthless without elements three and four.
The Flu season is fast approaching and so are cases of the Ebola virus. “The Ebola outbreak in West Africa was first reported in March 2014, and has rapidly become the deadliest occurrence of the disease since its discovery in 1976” (“Ebola: Mapping the outbreak”). There is no self administered and/or cost friendly medical tool available that the public can use to expose this Ebola virus. But the future does hold some promising news about ways people can accurately identify Ebola in their own home. Now that litmus paper may be the solution to detecting cases of Ebola, news articles such as the one talked about in this reflection are trying to describe
The subject of death is one that many have trouble talking about, but Virginia Woolf provides her ideas in her narration The Death of the Moth. The moth is used as a metaphor to depict the constant battle between life and death, as well as Woolf’s struggle with chronic depression. Her use of pathos and personification of the moth helps readers develop an emotional connection and twists them to feel a certain way. Her intentional use of often awkward punctuation forces readers to take a step back and think about what they just read. Overall, Woolf uses these techniques to give her opinion on existence in general, and reminds readers that death is a part of life.
Opportunistic scientists, the most hypocritical deviants of the modern age, revolve around the scientific method, or at least they used to. The scientific method once involved formulating a hypothesis from a problem posed, experimenting, and forming a conclusion that best explained the data collected. Yet today, those who are willing to critique the work of their peers are themselves performing the scientific method out of sequence. I propose that scientists, or the "treasure hunters" of that field, are no longer interested in permanent solutions, achieved through proper use of the scientific method, and rather are more interested in solutions that guarantee fame and fortune.
The one instant I can pinpoint as the genesis of my interest in biomedical science was the winter of sixth grade, when I picked up a book on creativity and the brain. I found it fascinating, but what really struck me was that here was a several hundred page book that mostly talked about how little we knew about its topic. It made me think. This was supposed to be a book about how much we’ve learned, and what it’s saying is that the progress we’ve made is only in finding out how little we know. This didn’t upset me; it made me curious. Because, of all the things that we should know about, surely our own minds and our own bodies are paramount among them, and yet we still have so much to learn. I’ve since learned that this phenomenon is not restricted to the biological – gravity is one of the most important things in our lives, yet we do not know its cause. But the biomedical questions continue to fascinate me, perhaps because the answers are so vital. Sure, cosmology is intriguing, but what about a cure for cancer, or even the common cold? What about a way of repairing or bypass...
Some information is universal such as facts about a person’s birth or death. Our reading this week, points out that the work of researchers can have a worldwide impact on people’s lives (Committee on Science & Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.),