The Great Evolving Hand Experiment Response

614 Words2 Pages

The Great Evolving Hand Experiment Reflection Response

Describe the experiment. What is the most important thing you learned from this experiment? Provide an example (from the experiment to explain your answer).
The experiment detailed several milestones in the evolution of the human hand. For each step, the hand (simulated with a taped and handicapped modern hand) was given a task to test the effectiveness of its design. I learned that an increased number of fingers does not necessarily correlate with better performance in each task but it is instead attributed to the ability to use the hand given. For example, my “Fin” writing task outperformed three of the other four hand designs. Given additional fingers to incorporate, my writing deteriorated from the careful and neat first attempt.
What part(s) of your hand did you need most in order to complete each task? Provide an example (from the experiment) to support your argument.
I needed my thumb most to complete each task efficiently. Though it was possible to complete tasks like writing with a pencil and stretching an elastic, an opposable thumb allowed me to do both with incredible skill. The quality and precision of my writing improved dramatically with the addition of this finger (Pictured on the right: “Quadruple-claw/finger” above, Human hand below). The elastic band could be stretched a …show more content…

This probably served us well from their origin as “fins” (like a whale's’ or in Hand Shape 1) all the way to tree climbing “quadruple-claw/finger” (like a spider monkey or in Hand Shape 4). Having five fingers was always advantageous particularly recently with the advent of tools. I don’t think five is necessarily an optimal number of fingers and that the opposable thumb played a bigger role in the permanence of this design. Another opposable thumb making a total 6 fingers to a hand, could be an extremely advantageous

More about The Great Evolving Hand Experiment Response

Open Document