The Function Of The Other In Dracula

972 Words2 Pages

Bram Stoker’s Dracula introduces readers to a novel which closely examines the function of the ‘Other.’ In this particular novel, the immoral ‘Other’, positioned at the root of the disruptions in a progressing British society, is constructed as being physically and mentally diseased as well as essentially dangerous. Among the several ‘Othered’ characters, Renfield-the ‘unusual lunatic,’ emerges as an extremely interesting but often overlooked character. He is presented through the observations of Dr. Seward, and is carefully crafted as an unsettling blend of the British and human ‘Self’ with a diseased and decadent ‘Other’. This essay will therefore focus on how Renfield is constructed as the ‘Other’ within the ‘Self’, digressing from the psychological, …show more content…

He is constructed through the gaze of the psychologist Dr. Seward, who describes him as a complex lunatic who has “a method in his madness,” rationality behind his irrationality. He is the irrational ‘Other’ in a rational society, and the complex ‘Other’ among the ‘usual lunatic.’ Renfield’s ‘otherness’ is thus constructed through his unstable mind, making him the most vulnerable to Dracula’s influence. He is therefore the epitome of the ‘Other’ embodying the “late-nineteenth-century fear that human beings are soulless machines motivated solely by psychological factors.” (A. Stiles, 2006) In the case of Renfield, the latter disconnects himself from the human world by rejecting Dr. Seward and following Dracula when he says, “I don’t want to talk to you. You don’t count now. The master is at hand.” Here, we can see how unlike Mina, Van Helsing or Dr. Seward, Renfield backs off from the humane ‘Holy duty’ of destroying the immoral Count consequently living as an experimental vessel influenced by an exterior force. The irony however, lies in the fact that it is Dracula himself that kills Renfield. This shows how the mentally unstable ‘Other’ is not only rejected by the rational British society but is also rejected by Dracula as he is just an unsteady ‘’soulless machine’’ whose blood, life or abilities are …show more content…

His unhealthy body is characterised by the same element which makes Dracula and Lucy degenerates, the intake of blood. He is thus constructed as the ‘Other’ with an unquenching thirst and need for “red blood, with years of life in it.” Renfield’s desire for blood moves towards a sole purpose, to become stronger, thereby experiencing an evolution. Dollimore explores how the “idea of evolutionary degeneration” is an “extreme catastrophic unbinding of civilisation,” that is, when trying to experience an evolution the individual cuts lose from civilisation and his humanity altogether. In Renfield’s case, by trying to experience similar evolution as Lucy and Dracula, Renfield commits an even greater misdeed, as unlike vampires; he decides to consume blood by choice, and not by

Open Document