The Fragility Of Masada Analysis

663 Words2 Pages

Revka makes this remark regarding the fragility of Masada but this statement can be seen as much more than a mere description of the shelter. She mentions of “faith” to be the medium holding Masada together but also the culprit to their final downfall. For she believes that faith has blinded their sight, veiling the truth under false hopes that upon careful inspection would reveal to be “empty inside”. Like the clouds that drift onto the top of deserts, “promising rain” to those who pleaded water in the ruthless desert but failing to provide so, Masada is akin in this situation; Masada will not become the savour for these deserted people, although it may appear so. “Clouds” are also usually associated with a negative connotation, causing discomfort …show more content…

What holds true to your own belief and your outlook on life is “invisible to the eye.” Revka makes several references to signs of bad omen that were rendered transparent under her judgment because her eyes had merely observed and failed to divine. Unfortunately in her situation, what appeared to be a place of safety had instead generated possibly the most danger. However, the contrary also holds true, adversities can also be of positive value; an ordeal can become a lesson, a spark for growth, an experience that shapes the person for the better. The outcome is dependent on the perception of the situation, one must be able to see in a new light to turn a bad into good, and, likewise, be able to extract the bad from the good. Revka’s statement can also be found in other literature such as the short story “Cathedral” by Raymond Carver, where ironically a blind man was able to understand the true value in others better than those who were not visually impaired. Perhaps the loss of his visual was not a half-empty cup but rather a half-full one because he is able to visualize ideas beyond the surface and truly see the important details “invisible to the

Open Document