The Fourth Of July Analysis

562 Words2 Pages

Audre Lorde in her essay The “Fourth of July”(1982) asserts that freedom is not necessarily for all in the US. She develops her claim by utilizing situational irony, long flowing sentences, imagery. Lorde’s purpose is to show people the cracks in the ideals that the United States of America were founded on in order to get people to challenge those ideals themselves. She adopts a transforming tone to appeal to citizens who are not aware of racial issues that are relevant to them. Lorde ends her essay by extrapolating that America’s basic foundation of freedom is completely flawed. She appeals to the questioning minds of the audience by stating her internal conflicts, “‘But we hadn’t done anything!’ This wasn’t right or fair! Hadn’t I written poems about Bataan and freedom and democracy for all?” and “injunction coming from my mother: who looked like one of those people we were never supposed to trust.” She uses this irony to show the contradictions in the everyday world that people become so accustomed to. This use of irony by Lorde transmits evidence of the inconsistencies in the ideals of a “free” nation like the USA. Her use of irony is just as effective as her use of imagery. …show more content…

Lorde allures to the rebellious nature of the human mind that is oppressed by saying, “I left childhood was white, and the white heat and the white pavement and the white stone monuments.” as well as saying, “I viewed Julys through an agonizing corolla of dazzling whiteness and I always hated the Fourth of july.” Lorde describes the situation with so much details in order for people to visualize the struggle of people oppressed in a free government. The very descriptive nature of her words paint a vivid picture for those unaware of the issues in America and inspire them to make a change. Imagery is very useful to prove her point, as well as her sentence

Open Document