The Four P's Framework Of Foreign Policy

1326 Words3 Pages

The four P’s framework of foreign policy simply put is the “influences of the foreign policy”. It’s the four basic and inferred ideas in which we the United States of America are founded upon. The four basic ideas are Power, Peace, Prosperity and Principle; they not only determine our selections but the choices of most other countries. These four basic goals of nations make “states” behavior and the effect of their behavior very predictable.
The Four Ps of framework of foreign policy is the idea that all state behavior and outcome of their behavior is predictable based on the simple idea that all states go to war for these four reasons. Although our policy states that all acts of war are for the “preservation of independence and territory” it is understood by all other states that we, the United States of …show more content…

The nucleus of power within a nation is self- defense and a need for global interdependence of nations. We the United States for example achieved peace by making a global alliance within countries. An alliance that took off with the four greatest super powers or what people frequently refer to as the constabulary of the United Nations and 47 other states. After the near world domination by Germany of other lands, nations agreed that a world government was necessary in society to maintain peace amongst nations to prevent future conflicts against nations. All states that denied this proposal were considered as threats to the superpowers and most importantly the US. Deterrence is the global view that the US is too strong and too powerful to go to war with so by fear of retaliation,

Show More
Related

  • National Security Structure Development in Steven Hook and John Spanier's Book, American Foreign Policy Since WWII

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Dbq

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the 20th century, successive presidents pursued foreign policy in different ways but with one objective and that is to make America the most powerful nation on earth. Despite the challenges of each administration during this century, presidents found a way to put American at the frontline as the undisputed super power. President Taft pursued an aggressive foreign policy by introducing dollar diplomacy which was meant to encourage U.S. investments in the Latin America and the Caribbean. He used government officials to promote this policy in hope that it will create markets for American products in the region. President Wilson made a promise to the American people that he will focus on domestic policy agenda and rarely will his administration

    Read More

  • United States Foreign Policy DBQ

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the "Roaring Twenties" people were living up to the modern standards of society. Then the Great Depression began and the joy and excitement disappeared and tension manifested. In the time period of 1920-1941 America experienced major global events that occurred in extremely short rapid intervals of time. From the end of World War I in 1918 to the Roaring Twenties, straight to the Great Depression in 1929, into the beginning of World War II in 1939, and all the way to the horror of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941, America faced these occurrences with difficulty and confusion. But with the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, quick and immediate responses were made to stabilize America. Among his responses

    Read More

  • American Foreign Policy Dbq

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between 1895 and 1920, the years in which William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, and Woodrow Wilson reigned in the presidents, the United States struggled for not only justice at home but abroad as well. During this period policies such as Roosevelt’s Big Stick diplomacy, William Taft’s Dollar diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson’s Moral diplomacy were all used in foreign affairs in hopes of benefit for all involved. However, it would be appropriate to say that self-interest was the most important driving factor for American policy and can be exemplified through economic, social, and political relations.

    Read More

  • Analyzing America's Shift in Foreign Policy

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...d by examining the statements made by such politicians - particularly, and in this instance nearly, exclusively, Woodrow Wilson - which demonstrate a newly formed drive to intervene in nations outside of the Americas in order to provide for peace, democracy and self-determination. Moreover, whether these new intentions may exist for positive and truthful, or negative and elusive reasons, they most certainly were not consistent with traditional American values on foreign policy, as previous sentiments inherent to, and precipitated by, such foundational principles as the Monroe Doctrine are entirely contradictory. Thus, in complete summary, one may arrive at two, primary conclusions: namely, that not only was this shift caused by economic and ideological factors, but that such motives disembarked from preceding sentiments on America’s involvement in foreign affairs.

    Read More

  • Jfk Foreign Policy

    798 Words  | 2 Pages

    When John F. Kennedy became president, he began a personal policy initiative to bring together African nationalist leaders. The policy was constructed to better the connection between the U.S. and Africa, and make an effective change in the direction of U.S. foreign relations. The Kennedy administration thought that the Cold War could be won or lost depending on whether Washington or Moscow won the hearts and minds of the Third World. During 1960-61 Africa was especially important because a wave of independence saw nineteen newly independent African states admitted into the United Nations. By 1962 both Washington and Moscow sought to add 31 of the UN's 110 member states that were from the African continent. the Cold War only deepened the need

    Read More

  • US Foreign Policy During the 20th Century

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is the intention of this essay to explain the United States foreign policy behind specific doctrines. In order to realize current objectives, this paper will proceed as follows: Part 1 will define the Monroe Doctrine, Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 will concurrently explicate the Roosevelt Corollary, Good Neighbor Policy, and the Nixon Doctrine, discuss how each policy resulted in U.S. involvement in Latin American countries, describe how it was justified by the U.S. government, respectively, and finally, will bring this paper to a summation and conclusion.

    Read More

  • Wilsonian Realism In America's We Saved The World

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    says that national interests should be characterized by real politik. A viewpoint that U.S. foreign

    Read More

  • Indispensable Nation Thesis Statement

    777 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the next section of Carpenter’s argument, he discusses the failure of the U.S. to recognize the different forms of engagement options. The most constructive alternative to the current indispensable policy is the consortium model of regional actors that has the U.S. serving as the “first among equals” (pg.24) allowing the U.S. to off-load security responsibilities as well as adopting a more detached strategic role would benefit the U.S. at minimal

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Essay

    1319 Words  | 3 Pages

    Overall, America’s foreign policy changed dramatically throughout the course of the 20th century. From the Monroe Doctrine to the Vietnam War, foreign policy has had a major impact on American society. It has shifted from not interfering with internal European affairs, to maintaining internal peace and security, to containing the spread of Communism, to playing ping pong with the Chinese to create and maintain trade with them. The idea of Foreign Policy has changed since it has started and will continue to change until the United States of America is no longer.

    Read More

  • On War by Carl Von Clausewitz

    1315 Words  | 3 Pages

    Current military leadership should comprehend the nature of war in which they are engaged within a given political frame in order to develop plans that are coherent with the desired political end state. According to Clausewitz, war is an act of politics that forces an enemy to comply with certain conditions or to destroy him through the use of violence. A nation determines its vital interests, which drives national strategy to obtain or protect those interests. A country achieves those goals though the execution of one of the four elements of power, which are diplomatic, informational, military and economical means. The use of military force...

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Essay

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    To understand the power struggle relating to foreign policymaking, it is crucial to understand what foreign policy entails. The Foreign Policy Agenda of the U.S. Department of State declares the goals of foreign policy as "to build and sustain a more democratic, secure, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community." While this definition is quite vague, the actual tools of foreign policy include Diplomacy, foreign aid, and military force.

    Read More

  • American Foreign Policy: Human Rights and Democratization

    1794 Words  | 4 Pages

    Endicott, John E.; Johnson, Loch K.; Papp, Daniel S. (2005) American foreign policy: history, politics and policy. N.Y.: Pearson.

    Read More

  • Political Realism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    People’s ideas and assumptions about world politics shape and construct the theories that help explain world conflicts and events. These assumptions can be classified into various known theoretical perspectives; the most dominant is political realism. Political realism is the most common theoretical approach when it is in means of foreign policy and international issues. It is known as “realpolitik” and emphasis that the most important actor in global politics is the state, which pursues self-interests, security, and growing power (Ray and Kaarbo 3). Realists generally suggest that interstate cooperation is severely limited by each state’s need to guarantee its own security in a global condition of anarchy. Political realist view international politics as a struggle for power dominated by organized violence, “All history shows that nations active in international politics are continuously preparing for, actively involved in, or recovering from organized violence in the form of war” (Kegley 94). The downside of the political realist perspective is that their emphasis on power and self-interest is their skepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations among states.

    Read More

  • The Realist Approach to International Relations

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    To conclude, there are four main components of the realist approach to international relations, they are: state which includes egoism as the states are composed by the selfish people, self-help which includes balance of power as power is used to enhance the survival rate, survival which includes hegemony in order to maintain its position and anarchical system which related to lust for power and led to security dilemma.

    Read More

More about The Four P's Framework Of Foreign Policy

Open Document