The Four Eras Of Policing

859 Words2 Pages

The law enforcement profession has evolved and improved over time. However, the basic concept of to protect citizens, answer calls for service, and arrest offenders has withstood centuries of changes. Throughout the evolution, several periods in history have defined policing.
The political era was during a period of time shortly after Sir Robert Peel created the Metropolitan Police Department, the first modern police force in England in 1829 (Reiner, 1992). This era lasted from 1840 until the 1920s and was filled with political party loyalty and law enforcement appointments based on that loyalty (Cole & Gertz, 2013). The second era was the professional or reform era that lasted from 1920s until the 1970s, which sought to remove the political …show more content…

However, this movement might have occurred earlier than 2001. During the 1990s, Compstat became part of Chief William Bratton’s technological information push to fight increasing violent crime rates in New York City as well as the citizens’ outrage over that increase (Weisburd, Mastrofski, McNally, Greenspan, & Willis, 2003). Compstat was weekly meetings to hold operational divisional commanders accountable for the crime in their assigned area (Weisburd, Mastrofski, McNally, Greenspan, & Willis, 2003). Even though Compstat was an accountability mechanism for Chief Bratton’s staff, the push for data driven policing, information, along with the use of geocoding and crime mapping was an important part of the process (Rosenbaum, 2007). Although computers, crime mapping, and other advanced technological innovations were improved since the community-policing era, there were also several distinctive terrorist events that accelerated the information …show more content…

Between 2003 and 2007, fusion centers were a way for law enforcement agencies to share information about domestic terrorist events (Cole & Gertz, 2013). The goal of any intelligence center is to collect and share information and intelligence. Many fusion centers are located within state or local police departments and are staffed with civilian as well as police analyst (Monahan & Palmer, 2009). Although the basic framework of policing is still in effect, the added dimension of possible terrorist attacks has forced law enforcement to advance their techniques to uncover possible terrorists’ incidents to provide safety and security to the citizens of the United States. One derivative of this intelligence gathering is the use of surveillance cameras to monitor critical infrastructures within the local and state boundaries (Monahan & Palmer, 2009). Although the intended purpose was for critical infrastructure monitoring, police benefitted from the increased funding for fear of future attacks and have expanded the use of their surveillance cameras into neighborhoods and highly travelled areas (Haggerty & Gazso, 2005). With the increased funding from the government, information and intelligence is overly

Open Document