The Flixborough Explosion Case

1981 Words4 Pages

Flixborough explosion
Prepared by H00154197 – Daniel Alvarez
Date: 1st June 1974
Different, unusual, unique: Rapid explosion, happened during a weekend (only around 70 employees), In 1974
Nypro was the sole manufacturer of caprolactam in Great Britain
Facility site: Flixborough Nypro caprolactam plant, Flixborough, England
Task being performed: Cyclohexane oxidation
Impacts: 28 people killed, 89 injured, plant physical assets destroyed (180 million dollars), collateral damage: other minor injuries, around 2,000 buildings around site damaged
1. Account of the disaster
The Nypro caprolactam plant in Flixborough produced 70,000 tonnes/year, they moved from
20,000 tonnes a year by the addition of a new unit which employed cyclohexane in 1972.
The cyclohexane oxidation unit used to increase the plant capacity was composed of six reactors (20 tonne capacity each). The reactors were made of mild steel (13mm) with rustproof plating (3mm internally). “The throughput circulating from one reactor to the next through piping systems of 28” diameter is 250‐300m3h.”1
On March 27th 1974 a reactor 5 was found leaking and it was decided to take it out of service for repair. In order to maintain production a temporary bypass pipe was installed between the
No. 4 and No. 6 reactor. An inspection found a 6’ long crack had developed and reached the internal plating which had deteriorated as well.
Later through metallurgical analysis they found the cracks had generated through nitrate stress corrosion cracking. The plant operators had adopted the practice of spraying nitrate treated water to disperse leaks; this decision had not been properly assessed or discussed with any of the engineers.
The cost of loss production if the gap had not been bridged was ...

... middle of paper ...

...ol on changes**
 Importance of hazard assessment during design*, **
Out of these lessons in our analysis we evaluated the consequences of not following licensing procedures to handle hazardous flammable material and having a large inventory in plant (*)
“ […] 330,000 gallons of cyclohexane, 66,000 gallons of naphta, 11,000 gallons of methyl benzene, 26,400 gallons of benzene, 450 gallons of gasoline.” LAGRADEC, P.
Without having this inventor in the first place the impact would have been to a lesser extent.
We also evaluated how lack of knowledge and understanding led management to create deficient management mechanisms. (**) Job clarity, functional competency, change control management, risk assessments, inspection and monitoring, were all deficient areas that should have been addressed by management had they understood the potential impact they had in their hands.

Open Document