The Fire And Ice Analysis

1443 Words3 Pages

Accepting change can be both hard and scary. With change comes discomfort, insecurity, and the possibility of negative results. Although younger generations have an easier time adjusting to and accepting the ever-changing world in ways such as technology, education, and what is to be considered ‘typical’, older generations seem to have a tougher time breaking from tradition and giving new things a try. Four authors discuss the difficulty some have of accepting change through poetry, song, and informative articles, and the impact it has on society or an individual. At first their writings may seem unrelated. However, although the formats, stories, and directions are different, there is one thing in which they become strongly unified; the particular pieces of literature all uniquely share a common theme that shows …show more content…

He begins the piece by stating two different options to choose from: “Some say the world will end in fire, / Some say in ice” (Lines 1-2). He then attributes love and desire to heat but says he has experienced the other side of cold which represents hate and destruction. “From what I’ve tasted of desire / I hold with those who favor fire. / But if it had to perish twice, / I think I know enough of hate / To say that for destruction ice is also great / And would suffice” (Lines 3-9). He’s indecisive in his decision-making, agreeing with both sides of the controversy. He knows that the world is to change (ending in fire or ice), but doesn’t know how or when. This is where his underlying fears become evident - he feels hopeless doom for the changes to come. The only way he can feel some control is if he thinks he knows how it will all end. Sometimes change is inevitable, however people still consciously worry about things they cannot control. By making the change and either/or situation, he feels more comfortable with accepting the change since there’s only one of two ways he could leave the

Open Document