The Fall Of Icarus Essay

974 Words2 Pages

The three works, despite dealing with the same story, have a contrasting focus. Ovid's myth "Concerning the Fall of Icarus" from Metamorphoses depicts the fall of Icarus as a tragic event that occurs as a punishment for Icarus’s disobedience and fatal curiosity. Several millennia later, Pieter Brueghel adopted the icon in the sixteenth century for his painting Landscape with the Fall of Icarus. Also, in the twentieth century W. H. Auden alluded to the myth in his poem "Musée Des Beaux Arts." Brueghel and Auden shifted the focus and depicted the fall of Icarus as a neglected occurrence that fails to even gain the attention of the eyewitnesses.
In Ovid’s myth the main focus was Deadalus, while Brueghel’s painting did not even depict Daedalus and even the title’s focus was on Icarus as it is called “the fall of Icarus”. Ovid repeatedly uses foreshadowing to create a sense of sympathy to Icarus and to show the tragic end of Daedalus’ ambition. Ovid uses foreshadowing in order to show that Icarus was a victim of his own curiosity, when he says “not knowing he was dealing with his own downfall” (pg.187). Foreshadowing was also repeated when Daedalus’ “cheeks were wet with tears and his hands trembled. He kissed his son (good-bye, if he had known it)” (pg.188). The main theme in the myth relates to Daedalus' vain attempts to caution his son, encouraging Icarus to take the middle road: “I warn you, Icarus, fly a middle course” (pg.188). Ovid’s diction shows the gravity of the situation as he chooses the words “I warn you”. Daedalus further tires to teach his son by telling him “don’t go too low, or water will weigh you down; don’t’ go too high, or the sun’s fire will burn them” (pg.188). Again, here Daedalus’ repetition of the word “d...

... middle of paper ...

...r chose to ignore it, until “the blue sea hushed him”.
Brueghel and Auden contrast Ovid’s myth, as they focus on human’s apathy to suffering. In “The Fall of Icarus”, Brueghel focused his entire piece on the spectators and the landscape, and Icarus was only the backdrop. Auden, similarly to Brueghel focuses on the mundane activities done by spectators and on their indifference to Icarus ‘suffering. In Ovid’s myth the story was told from the Ovid’s perspective who felt the pain and suffering Daedalus’ felt as a result of his loss. Therefore, the spectators looking in amazement acts as a commemoration of Daedalus’’ son. Yet in Brueghel’s painting, Icarus was not only ignored but he was also drawn as proportionately smaller to the spectators; hence showing that he is not considered as significant and that the mundane selfish activities were of higher significance.

Open Document