Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What was the impact of the failure of the schlieffen plan
What was the impact of the failure of the schlieffen plan
Failure of the Schlieffen plan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Failure of the Schlieffen Plan and Its Effects on the German Defeat on the Western Front By the spring of 1914, imperial Germany was spoiling for war. Germany’s leaders were determined to break up the Triple Entente of Britain, France & Russia that had isolated Germany in Europe & thwarted its territorial ambitions. And when Arch-Duke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated on June 28 1914 it gave Kaiser Wilhelm the reason to declare war. In the diplomatic controversy growing out of the assassination, the Kaiser backed Austria-Hungary & totally opposed Russia. This started a series of political & military tactics that made a war inevitable. The constraints of The German ‘Master Plan’ for mobilisation, The Schlieffen Plan, would inevitably involve both Britain & France in any conflict between the Kaiser and the Tsar. And so when Germany declared war on Russia on August 1st World War 1 was launched. “Germany’s inability to produce a quick victory of autumn 1914 resulted in the war of stalemate for which the country was militarily & economically unprepared & ill-suited” Bismarck to Hitler 1890-1937 By Geoff Layton There were many consequences that arose from the Schlieffen plans failure, such as the resignation of General Von Moltke who made changes to the original plan; he apparently burst into Kaiser Wilhelm’s office declaring, “The war is lost”, Years Of Change 1890-1945. He was replaced by the eager but less experienced General Von Falkenhigh, this was not good and would make Germany seem weak if the Allies found out they were replacing Generals. It also did not help inspire German morale or the war effort. Another consequence... ... middle of paper ... ...icers were killed and Naval Boats were captured. This was the final nail in the coffin for a German victory on the Western front. The amnesty was eventually signed on 11 November 1918, which introduced the Treaty of Versailles and ended the war, whilst Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated 17 days later on 28th November & fled to Holland thus ending the reign of Kaisers in Germany. In answer to the question, I believe the answer is no. The Schlieffen plan was not the sole cause of the German defeat on the Western Front in 1918. The plan failed on 11 September 1914 whereas the war ended on 11 November 1918, exactly four years & three months after the plan failed. However, the consequences of the failed plan led to many long & short-term causes that further led to the demise of the Germans on the Western Front from 1914-1918.
criticized for this, he stood by his decision stating that he knew the Russians would force the army into the cold harsh, Russian winter, such as the case of Napoleon. Even though Schlieffen came up with this wonderful and well thought out plan, his successor, General von Moltke, changed the plans entirely.
Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen was a German field marshal who served as the Chief of the Imperial German General Staff from 1891 to 1906. He is known for the Schlieffen Plan, a strategic plan designed to defeat Russia and France, which involved fighting both fronts at the same time.
Assessment of the Reasons for Allied Victory in 1918 During 1918, the effect of Stalemate along the Western Front saw 4 years of war trying to break it. Ideas and technology were outdated and often tactics were unrealistic. A stretch in German supplies, the intervention of the USA, the strategic strength of the allies along with the deteriorating German homefront effort due to the naval blockade saw the collapse their war effort. From the failure of the Schlieffen Plan due to poor planning and heavy reliance of the 42-day deadline, the German army also had the difficulty of fighting a war on two fronts. These factors reflected poorly on the leadership of the German high commanders.
The Battle of Britain as a Turning Point in the Defeat of German in World War Two
...did not exist.” However, when this information arrived the next morning, Haig told Rawlinson that “The enemy has undoubtedly been severely shaken and our correct course, therefore, is to press him hard with the least possible delay” . This military strategy was one which led, as Terraine argued, to long-term success. Primary source German Order of the Day from General Von Bulow on 3 July stated “the decisive issue of the war depends on… our victory on the Somme. We must win this battle…” . Furthermore, Haig’s strategy is shown to be perceptive and correct when we consider Ludendorff’s, German Chief of Staff, thoughts: “We were completely exhausted on the Western Front… If the war lasted our defeat seemed inevitable... I cannot see as I look back how the German G.H.Q. could have mastered the situation if the Allies had continued their blows as they did in 1916.”
The Schlieffen Plan in The First World War In 1894, France had made a treaty with Russia, meaning that if France or Russia ever declared war or became under attack they would fight for each other. When Germany declared war on France in 1914, they soon realised they would have to fight a war on two fronts; Russia and France. The German Chief Of Staff, Count Alfred Von Schlieffen, designed the Schlieffen Plan, thought up in 1905, to defeat France and their allies Russia.
The battle of the bulge was the final battle to defeat Nazi Germany in Europe. Russia did not have actual soldiers in the battle however, it was their strong efforts that drove Germany west enough for Great Britain and the United States to attack Germany on two sides.
war went on, was that of encouraging at least some degree L&LL. At the same time they stoically maintained a toecap-to-toecap confrontation with the German Army whilst periodically energetically pursuing the High Command’s policy of continuous offensive action. This meant that when the German High Command in 1918 finally felt obliged by external factors to take the great gamble of their last great offensive on the Western Front, the German Army suffered increasingly unsustainable levels of attrition to their armies. Secondly, by thus steadfastly holding the Germans and their allies at bay in the trenches, the trench fighters enabled the twin pressures of the Allied land and sea blockade, and the failure of German State’s domestic production, to squeeze the fighting heart out the German nation and its autocratic rulers.
3. Once the war began, Germany developed a clear set of aims, already discussed before the war, to gain large territorial gains in central and eastern Europe, very similar to Hitler’s later craving for Lebensraum (‘living space’) in eastern Europe. Fischer believes that the First World War was not a preventative war, but that it was planned and launched by Germany aggressively in order to dominate Europe. Furthermore, Fischer sees Bethmann Hollweg in the role of the main constructor of the German policy during the July Crisis in 1914, and also as a central figure in the development of Germany’s expansionist goals once the war started. The Egmont Zechlin thesis Egmont Zechlin thinks that Bethmann Hollweg took a “calculated risk” in July 1914 to gain diplomatic victory, or if it failed, to fight a “defensive preventive war” with nearly no objectives. This explains that Germany did not prepare a huge plan for expansion.
The Reasons why the Western Front was Broken There were many equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front was finally broken: New technology like the tank The American entry into the war The blockading of German ports The German offensive in March 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement The new technology and tactics helped to break stalemate. The machine gun and artillery had been used since the outbreak of the war making attacking almost impossible. Then they made the wonder-weapon other wise known as the tank. It was first used during the Somme by the British but they had very little tanks and most of them broke down before they arrived at the front.
Germany experienced a lot of economic changes after Germany was split into East Germany and West Germany. Initially, West Germany was established as a federal republic but was established as it’s own independent nation in 1955. Many events happened in West Germany from the 1950s to the 1980s before Germany became one nation again. There were events such as “oils price shocks, generous social programs, rising deficits and loss of control.” East Germany’s economy was strong due to the Soviet Union’s reliance on Eastern Germany’s production of machine tools, chemicals and electronics. It became appealing to reunite with West Germany when the value of East Germany’s currency became “worthless” outside of it’s country because Eastern Germany was relying on the Soviet Union’s demand (Marketline).
The general public of Germany had never had any say in political matters; they allowed the Kaiser to make all the decisions regarding themselves and their once-prosperous country. The groups controlling Germany began to change during October and November 1918. More power began to fall into the hands of the people as they realised the blame for their involvement in the war was the Kaiser’s. People such as the armed soldiers, sailors and workers started protesting and going on strike. This was a far cry from before the war, when Germany was wealthy, proud and ambitious. So for a brief period, it seemed that a revolution would take place, with the people of Germany wanting a social and political revolution.
In addition, having lost the war, the humiliated Germans were forced by the Allies to sign the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 that officially ended World War I. According to the harsh terms of the treaty, Germany had to hand over many of its richest industrial territories to the victors, and was made to pay reparations to the Allied countries it devastated during the war. Germany lost its pride, prestige, wealth, power, and the status of being one of Europe's greatest nations. (Resnick p. 15)
After a Serbian was arrested for the assassination Austria-Hungary pulled out of the peace talks and declared war on Serbia. Germany who was allied with Austria-Hungary also declared war on Serbia. Russia who was allied with Serbia had to declare war on Germany and Austria-Hungary. When Germany invaded France and Belgium, Great Britain declared war on Germany. World War 1 had begun. As the German Chancellor, Bethmann-Hollweg said, “Once the dice are cast nothing can stop them.” Indeed once the dice were cast on World War 1 nothing stopped them until 22 million people had died.
Plan 17 was a great setback for France and did not help them succeed at the beginning of the war because of the soldiers they lost and it’s outcome that resulted in failure. Plan 17 was done in August of 1918 and it consisted of an advance by four French Armies into Alsace and Lorraine on either side of the Metz-Thionville fortresses, occupied by the Germans since 1871. The southern wing of the invasion forces would first capture Alsace and Lorraine, in that order, while the northern wing would, depending upon German movements, advance into Germany via the southern Ardennes forests, or else move north-east into Luxembourg and Belgium (Godl). The French were quickly repelled by German armies and their pursuit to conquer Alsace and Lorraine was not successful. “It is clearly evident that the French were oblivious to the gigantic German offensive that was being aimed at their left (northern) wing. Plan XVII gravely underestimated the strength that the Germans would deploy against France.” (Royde-...