The Epic Of Gilgamesh Analysis

1311 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Summary of the epic gilgamesh

Mastering the Art of Puppetry In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the main character, Gilgamesh is first introduced as a glorious king of Uruk who is one-third human and two-thirds god. The idea that Gilgamesh is one third human and two thirds god is impossible because this would imply that Gilgamesh has three biological parents, in which two of them are gods and the other, a human. Indeed this notion is hard to believe but by closely investigating the way that the gods treat Gilgamesh, it becomes clear that this idea was not a mistake. While it may seem as if Gilgamesh is part god, a closer examination reveals that that detail about him being two thirds god only serves as a reminder that he is a superior human being, and because of this, Gilgamesh …show more content…

This is significant because if the gods can present themselves in the form of Gilgamesh, it becomes evident that the one third of Gilgamesh that is human serves as a rebound for the gods’ …show more content…

His actions are anything but civilized, yet the people of Uruk can only complain about him. They lament to the gods: “A goddess made him, strong as a savage bull, none can withstand his arms….His lust leaves no virgin to her lover, neither the warrior’s daughter nor the wife of the nobel” (Gilgamesh, 13). Gilgamesh oppresses his own people and yet he is still the king of Uruk. The people of Uruk know that Gilgamesh is part god and they respect that part of him. This can be seen when the people state in the very beginning, “a goddess made him” (Gilgamesh, 13). The fact that this is stated first in their lament emphasizes that they are in disbelief that a creation of god can be flawed. Flawed in the sense that they were secured from the dangers outside of the walls, but were not secure from the dangers within the walls. Oddly enough, they do not blame Gilgamesh’s godly strength. Instead, they blame it on Gilgamesh’s lust. Lust is a very strong sexual desire that is not often portrayed as a god-like characteristic. This aspect emphasizes the human side of Gilgamesh that is not described in the prologue. This accusation subconsciously serves as a tool of propaganda for the gods. It serves to portray that humans are the ones to blame and that the gods are never at fault. This notion portrays the human side of Gilgamesh as the culprit and implies that godly part of him had no effect on his

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Gilgamesh Without Enkidu

    1385 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk, one who is macho, irresponsible, and simply not fit to be in the position that his blood status has put him in. His decisions are constantly making the people of Uruk

    Read More

  • Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gilgamesh was a very self confident and at times that self confidence led to him to have little compassion for the people of Uruk at he beginning of the story. He was their king, but not their protector; he kills their sons and rapes their daughters. He felt like he was superior to others due to the fact that he was two-thirds god, his mother was a goddess Ninsun and one third human. This fact is the key to all of his actions. This is also what sets him apart from the hero Odysseus.

    Read More

  • A Hero, The Gods, and Mortal Men

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gilgamesh is a strong, powerful, arrogant leader that is two-thirds god and one part human. Gilgamesh was truly a hero by showing his skill in battle, intelligence, valor, reverence, and yet he held a respect for death. On his quest to finding the plant that contained the components for a mortal man to acquire everlasting life, the protagonist overcame obstacles and complications. Gilgamesh slay the demon monster, keeper of the forest, Humbaba and showed his impressive fighting skill. The man that was more than half of a god showed his arrogance by refusing the goddess Ishtar’s love. Gilgamesh walked past giant scorpions and rowed his way through a sea that consumed anything that touched its surface. Throughout the epic of Gilgamesh, the story is rash, violent, and impetuous; however, it not until he finally acquires wisdom that he earns the respect and devotion of his people. The lines within the oldest text amongst men proclaimed what he had learned was when the epic states that “he looked at the w...

    Read More

  • Gilgamesh

    314 Words  | 1 Pages

    Gilgamesh feels that just because he is 2/3 god and 1/3 man that he has more rights over regular people. The people of Uruk and myself do not feel that way at all. Gilgamesh is should not be treated better than us. Gilgamesh should be found guilty for the charge of violating the morals of the young for a number of wrong doings. First of all Gilgamesh forces young children to work as slaves. Children do not deserve to work as slaves; they are young and innocent and have done nothing wrong. Gilgamesh does not allow children to enjoy their childhood like they should. Instead, he forces them to work as slaves doing jobs that grown men should be doing.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Humbaba And Gilgamesh

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    Naturally portrayed as the hero on account of his being half divine. In tablet 1 we learn that Gilgamesh was a tyrant ruler by divine consent. On the contrary “fair in manhood, dignified in bearing/graced with charm in his whole person” (p 9). He was wise, he was handsome, and he was firm as a rock. The people lamented over him despite his conquering what he wanted, he slept with brides before their husbands. No one could contest his dominance. The acts Gilgamesh performed were morally reprehensible, and could be considered sinful and wicked. He caused harm, discomfort and was offensive. Gilgamesh corresponds with the definition of evil more than Humbaba. There are similarities and differences between Gilgamesh and

    Read More

  • Characteristics of Gilgamesh and Enkidu in Foster's The Epic of Gilgamesh

    830 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gilgamesh was considered a hero because he had many great qualities, such as loyalty, perseverance, and heroism. Although these are heroic traits, he also had his flaws and was self-righteous, selfish, and prideful. Gilgamesh was a great man and was seen as flawless and “perfect in strength” (4). He represented almost a human version of a god; therefore, making it hard to see his flaws because he seems so ideal. He appeared like the perfect man that had absolutely nothing wrong with him. He was very courageous and this was evident when he states, “There dwells in the forest the fierce monster Humbaba, [You and I shall] kill [him] [And] wipe out [something evil from the land]” (18). This statement shows both a heroic quality and a flaw in Gilgamesh. It shows his heroism and how he felt that he could accomplish great things. His statement also shows how prideful he was because he always wanted the glory and wanted to be seen as the hero. This comes from the fact that he was part human and part god and he knew how amazing everyone thought he was and felt that he needed to live up to that expectation. This can be seen as both positive and negative because it shows his determination, but yet shows his pride. Being prideful is not necessarily a good thing because in this situati...

    Read More

  • Questions for Analysis: 'Epic of Gilgamesh'

    660 Words  | 2 Pages

    3.     Utnapishtim complements Siduri’s message by giving analogies in regards to the fact that death is unexpected. Nothing is permanent or certain except death. You could build a house that’s believed to stand forever, but is it really true? Does an agreement hold for all time? These are the examples Utnapishtim gives. While death is certain, the time it occurs is not known by man.

    Read More

  • Friendship in the Epic of Gilgamesh

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some of Gilgamesh’s qualities are that he had a “beauty… surpassing all others” and was “two thirds… god and one third man” (13). Before Enkidu, Gilgamesh acted horribly. He was a terrible ruler and a terrible man. Gilgamesh was not all good, for example, “his lust leaves no virgin to her lover, neither the warrior’s daughter nor the wife of the noble…” (13). He was a terrible ruler. Gilgamesh was arrogant, but very powerful in his country. His people had no choice but to listen to him. They were forced to go along with his unlawfulness and stubbornness.

    Read More

  • Was Gilgamesh Insecure

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    In tablet one, stanza nine it states “Gilgmesh leaves no daughter to her mother, he seizes one, and then he takes another. “ To me what makes Gilgamesh insecure is how he has to get first dibs on every woman in the town of Uruk. He has such a bad character that he has to demand for sex, instead of getting it because women are attracted to him and his presence. In tablet one, stanza 11 it states” like a wild bull, intimidating men.” Gilgamesh is so insure that he has to put others down for him to feel tall. He feels the need to always be the center of attention, and all eyes on him. The people of Uruk do not like him. In tablet one, stanza 13 it states” Let each one match the other. Let him cease oppressing men so we can rest in peace.” Once again, it shows his ways have such a negative impact that the towns people are begging that his status is brought

    Read More

  • Role Of Gilgamesh In The Epic Of Uruk

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gilgamesh ignored many of these kingly duties and was eager to become heroic and godly. "The young men of Uruk he harries without warrant, Gilgamesh lets no son go free to his father. By day and by night his tyranny grows harsher" (George, Tablet I 67-69). The beginning of the epic depicts his kingship as tyrannical and immoral, which could go without question or complaint unless the gods will it. Although considered great for his many feats such as his great walls and military expeditions, his faults could not be questioned by the commoners, which show a flaw in Mesopotamian kingship. Therefore, the gods ask Anu to create a counterpart to Gilgamesh to balance his oppressive reign. "Let him be a match for the storm of his heart, let them vie with each other, so Uruk may be rested!" (Tablet I 97-98). Enkidu, Gilgamesh 's counterpart, was initially created as a wild, uncivilized man rather than a demigod king. His position was to serve as a person that would try to prevent Gilgamesh from becoming so lofty and boastful and to make him become mature and make rational decisions. This becomes evident in Enkidu 's first encounter with Gilgamesh at the wedding: "For the goddess of weddings the bed was laid out, Gilgamesh met with the maiden by night. Forward

    Read More

  • Gilgamesh and Modern Society

    385 Words  | 1 Pages

    The story itself reflects an image of the cultural situation in which it was conceived. One major difference between this ancient society and our own is the way in which we sustain our leaders. Gilgamesh's character, whether based on an actual person or not, is portrayed as a very powerful and proud person. He was created to be better and stronger than common man and he is favored by the gods. This portrayal of a super-human king indicates a deep respect for leadership by those who told this story. Likely, these people lived under the rule of a monarchy in which the King was the all powerful leader and lawmaker. In today's society though, it is not common for one person to have unlimited power. Our governments are designed to divide ruling power between numerous parties; in order to keep any one person from becoming all powerful. Today's society would not tolerate a king who could do as he pleases, even if he were a noble and just man. In the story, Gilgamesh's super-human strength and power are not always convenient to his subjects. "His arrogance has no bounds", and "his lust leaves no virgin to her lover," yet the people respect his authority. The supremacy of Gilgamesh in the story reflects the feelings toward leadership held by that society which created the story. The respect they had for an all powerful monarch is hard for us to understand today. Our society looks down on those who rule as dictators and labels them tyrants and enemies. It is odd to imagine living in a society where a king is to be respected.

    Read More

  • Free Epic of Gilgamesh Essays: Character of Gilgamesh

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    He feels that he is superior to others, due to the fact that he is two-thirds god, and one-third man. This arrogance leads to his being cruel at the beginning of the story. Gilgamesh is described as, two-thirds of him divine, one-third human. Gilgamesh does not allow the son to go with his father; day and night he oppresses the weak. Gilgamesh does not let the young woman go to her mother, the girl to the warrior, the bride to the young groomä (tablet I, column ii, 1, 12-13, 27-28).

    Read More

  • Epic Of Gilgamesh Research Paper

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Epic of Gilgamesh is an epic poem of a hero named Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh is seventy- five percent god and twenty- five percent human. Gilgamesh is a fierce warrior and is used to getting what he pleases whenever he wants, but he is not satisfied with all the things he has. Gilgamesh is lonely and wishes for a companion of some sort. The gods notice that Gilgamesh is starting to become too powerful for his own good and decide to create another being somewhat similar to Gilgamesh, but more powerful so that he is able to defeat Gilgamesh and bring him to his knees. They create a similar being named Enkidu. Enkidu starts off as just a very powerful being wondering the wilderness by himself. He, like Gilgamesh is lonely and wishes to find someone

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Gilgamesh And Odysseus

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gilgamesh was two-thirds God and one-third human that had no regards for his subjects he ruled. He mostly did as he pleased by taking advantage of his subjects, especially abusing women; therefore, he was feared rather than respected by his subjects.

    Read More

  • A Summary of the Epic of Gilgamesh

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Epic of Gilgamesh is a moving tale of the friendship between Gilgamesh, the demigod king of Uruk, and the wild man Enkidu. Accepting ones own mortality is the overarching theme of the epic as Gilgamesh and Enkidu find their highest purpose in the pursuit of eternal life.

    Read More

More about The Epic Of Gilgamesh Analysis

Open Document