The Dictatorship Of The Cabinet Case Study

954 Words2 Pages

In the British System members of the Cabinet are drawn from and are therefore accountable for Parliament – so the executive and legislature are thus fused. It can duly be referred as The Dictatorship of the Cabinet. So, the Prime Minister will draw Cabinet members from MPs in the House of Commons or member of the House of Lords (and can even make someone a Lord specifically to put them in the Cabinet). Secondly, government policy (e.g. planned legislation, orders issued, priorities decided for time or spending) is decided collectively – with the Cabinet, not the PM, deciding policy and the Prime Minister being Primus inter pares (‘First among equals). In practice though, full Cabinet only decides policy when there are major disagreements on …show more content…

This is vital for ministers to avoid undermining each other’s efforts. This is particularly important when spending is concerned and also because so many decisions are taken in cabinet committees which are attended by only the relevant ministers – which is why much of the full cabinet meetings are taken up by reports from the cabinet committees. In practice, day-to-day co-ordination is undertaken by the Cabinet Office, informal groups of ministers, and by the PM’s advisors. Fourthly, the concept of Cabinet government is that the Cabinet manages Parliamentary business, considering bills coming up that week, with the Chief Whip advising on how much opposition is expected. The Cabinet is appointed by the Prime Minister. The senior positions within the Cabinet are usually appointed by the Prime Minister within hours of an election victory. In British Politics, all Cabinet members are serving MP’s or peers though in the recent past, Tony Blair has experimented with allowing non-party politicians into Cabinet meetings – most notably Paddy Ashdown who lead the Liberal Democrats immediately after the 1997 …show more content…

In America, heads of government departments are selected for their expertise within their fields and they do not have to be serving politicians to be appointed by the president. In theory, Britain has a Cabinet government. This according to current constitutional theory, is where the Cabinet meets as a body to discuss issues relevant to the country. It discusses various points of view, weighs up arguments concerning whatever is being discussed and comes to a decision that is backed by the majority of the Cabinet. As such it becomes government policy, if supported in the House of Commons, and has the legitimacy of majority Cabinet support behind it. This means that decisions have collective responsibility behind them – all Cabinet members would be expected to publicly support and defend such policies. Cabinet ministers would also be expected to defend such policies during Parliamentary debates. If a Cabinet minister feels that he/she cannot defend a policy, he/she has the option to resign from the

Open Document