The Dichotomy Between Joseph Stalin And Leon Trotsky

274 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Factors that made stalin rise to power essay

The dichotomy between Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky is pivotal in understanding the power hierarchy in the Bolshevik party and their successful attempt at revolution in 1917. When considering the various schools of historiography examined, the views on the two political figures differs greatly depending on the sources school and therefore biases. However, generally Stalin is presented far more negatively in most historiographies being depicted suspicious and threatening, rapidly gaining power through deceptions and generally antagonizing the political climate of Soviet Russia, only being seen as truly pure in pro-Stalinist propaganda. Contrastingly, Trotsky is presented as cunning but never conniving, a prestigious and unparalleled military

Show More
Related

  • Lenin Laid the Foundation for Stalinism

    2439 Words  | 5 Pages

    As relations changed between Russia and the rest of the world, so did the main historical schools of thought. Following Stalins death, hostilities between the capitalist powers and the USSR, along with an increased awareness of the atrocities that were previously hidden and ignored, led to a split in the opinions of Soviet and Western Liberal historians. In Russia, he was seen, as Trotsky had always maintained, as a betrayer of the revolution, therefore as much distance as possible was placed between himself and Lenin in the schoolbooks of the 50s and early 60s in the USSR. These historians point to Stalin’s killing of fellow communists as a marked difference between himself and his predecessor. Trotsky himself remarked that ‘The present purge draws between Bolshevism and Stalinism… a whole river of blood’[1].

    Read More

  • The Development of Totalitarianism Under Stalin

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Development of Totalitarianism Under Stalin By 1928, Stalin had become the undisputed successor to Lenin, and leader of the CPSU. Stalin’s power of appointment had filled the aisles of the Party Congress and Politburo with Stalinist supporters. Political discussion slowly faded away from the Party, and this led to the development of the totalitarian state of the USSR. Stalin, through.

    Read More

  • Russia in the 1930s

    1648 Words  | 4 Pages

    In conclusion, many soviets citizens appeared to believe that Stalin’s positive contributions to the U.S.S.R. far outweigh his monstrous acts. These crimes have been down played by many of Stalin’s successors as they stress his achievements as collectivizer, industrializer, and war leader. Among those citizens who harbor feelings of nostalgia, Stalin’s strength, authority , and achievement contrast sharply with the pain and suffering of post-revolutionary Russia.

    Read More

  • Stalin vs. Trotsky

    3283 Words  | 7 Pages

    to do so if the workers of the West revolted, and he was right. Stalin

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Trotsky And Stalin

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    Trotsky was a Marxist revolutionary and theorist, and a Soviet politician who built the exchange of all political energy to the Soviets. When Lenin died, Trotsky and Stalin had to compete for the leading spot. In the end, Stalin came out on top by using propaganda techniques making it seem like Trotsky was a spy. After Stalin won, he kept Trotsky alive for a whole year just to blame social and economic problems on him. Joseph didn’t realize “The biggest problem with scapegoating a government is that it makes it much harder to solve social and economic problems,” (Douglas, governmentisgood.com). Trotsky was a very disliked person and was kicked out of multiple states, he even survived a machine gun attack on his home. Eventually, Stalin banished him from the USSR and had him assassinated by a Spanish communist, Ramon Mercader, in Coyoacan, Mexico on the 21st of August, 1940. Just like how Goldstein was demonized in society, Trotsky was

    Read More

  • Comparing Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro

    1377 Words  | 3 Pages

    There have been many dictators through out history that have shaped the way we look at them now. Sometimes it’s the way that dictators came to power that people judge them on. Sometimes it’s how long they stayed in power, but it’s not just how long they stayed in power. It’s what they did to stay in power. These two men are some of the most infamous dictators for those reasons alone. These men are Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro, and they played a huge part in shaping the way we look at dictators today.

    Read More

  • Everyday Stalinism

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    When most people hear the name Joseph Stalin, they usually associate the name with a man who was part of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He was willingly to do anything to improve the power of the Soviet Union’s economy and military, even if it meant executing tens of millions of innocent people (Frankforter, A. Daniel., and W. M. Spellman 655). In chapter three of Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book, Everyday Stalinism, she argues that since citizens believed the propaganda of “a radiant future” (67), they were able to be manipulated by the Party in the transformation of the Soviet Union. This allowed the Soviet government to expand its power, which ultimately was very disastrous for the people.

    Read More

  • Similarities And Differences Between Lenin And Stalin

    2265 Words  | 5 Pages

    Isaac Murrin Mr. J. Pharion Freshman English 20 February 2013 The Similarities and Differences between Lenin and Stalin Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were similar in what they claimed to be, but in actuality they were very different people. Although Stalin claimed that he followed Leninism, the philosophy that Lenin developed from Marxism, he often distorted it to follow what he wanted to do. While Lenin wanted to make a unified society without classes, with production in the hands of the people, while Stalin wanted to make Russia into a modern industrial powerhouse by using the government to control production. Lenin accomplished his goals through violence, because he thought achieving the Communist revolution was worth using violence, with a ‘The ends justify the means’ mentality. Stalin also used violence to accomplish his goals, however Stalin used much more violence than was often necessary to accomplish his goals.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Stalin and Hitler as Dictators

    1263 Words  | 3 Pages

    A Comparison of Stalin and Hitler as Dictators Adolf Hitler This assignment will introduce you to two men, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Two men that were responsible for genocide and mass destruction, similar in many ways though on two opposing sides with completely different fundamental ideas. Adolf Hitler was born as Adolf Schicklgruber in 1889 in Braunau am Inn, in Upper Austria and committed suicide in a Berlin bunker in 1945. He was Chancellor and Fuehrer of the Nazi-Empire from 1933 to 1945. Joseph Stalin was born as Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili in 1879 in the Caucasian town of Gori in Georgia and died of a brain haemorrhage in 1953 in Moscow.

    Read More

  • Stalin Vs. Hitler

    2651 Words  | 6 Pages

    Josef Stalin, a politician from the earliest beginnings of his life, strove to achieve a national sense of power during his reign over the citizens of Russia. Adolf Hitler, however, a born high school dropout somewhat longed for a place in life. He rather fell into his role as a politician, after his brief shortcomings in arts and sciences. These two individuals developed varying ideas to put their controlling minds to work to lead their political parties in the direction of total domination of the state.

    Read More

  • How Significant Was Lenin 's Leadership? The Bolshevik Consolidation Of Power?

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    This played well with the workers and soldiers and made it difficult to criticise the new government. As a result, Lenin’s introduction of the Cheka (1917) and the emergence of the Red Terror (1918) ensured his rule was absolute not only within the party but across the Soviet Union. It is the accumulation of these factors that highlighted Lenin’s leadership and practicality following the seizing of power as well as changes to society with War Communism and the NEP and the use of terror which were all vital to consolidating Bolshevik power.

    Read More

  • The Great Terror

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Great Terror, an outbreak of organised bloodshed that infected the Communist Party and Soviet society in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), took place in the years 1934 to 1940. The Terror was created by the hegemonic figure, Joseph Stalin, one of the most powerful and lethal dictators in history. His paranoia and yearning to be a complete autocrat was enforced by the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (NKVD), the communist police. Stalin’s ambition saw his determination to eliminate rivals such as followers of Leon Trotsky, a political enemy. The overall concept and practices of the Terror impacted on the communist party, government officials and the peasants. The NKVD, Stalin’s instrument for carrying out the Terror, the show trials and the purges, particularly affected the intelligentsia.

    Read More

  • The Great Terror in Russia

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.

    Read More

  • Marxism and Leninism

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.

    Read More

  • Leon Trotsky Personality

    1554 Words  | 4 Pages

    While Trotsky was a brilliant orator and military mastermind, willing to do whatever it took to win the war, his greatest flaw was that he greatly lacked the political traits necessary to gain support of his party and obtain the leadership during the power struggle with Stalin. Trotsky was unable to formulate realistic policies following the death of Lenin and increasingly lost the support of his party and the general populace, on the other hand Stalin was a master political manipulator who was able to mould any situation in a way which put him in an advantageous position. This is delineated upon in Trotsky’s continued obsession of Marxist theory and the idea of permanent revolution, an idea which showed little prospect of success. He was unable to recognise the want for his surrounding members to focus on their own country following 8 years of political turmoil, while Stalin was able to, promoting his idea of “socialism in one country.” Combined with this Trotsky continued to carry himself in an increasingly egotistical way, with his patronising and demeaning manner doing nothing to gain the support of his fellow members in the Politburo, lacked an understanding of party organisation, displayed naivety in internal party affairs and misunderstood the mood of the country. As David

    Read More

More about The Dichotomy Between Joseph Stalin And Leon Trotsky

Open Document