Real World-Esteem Consequences

The question of whether self- esteem has significance with real world- consequences is a valid concern. Ulrich Orth and Richard W. Robins provide the answer, with evidence contributed by researched studies, in their article The Development of Self- Esteem that self- esteem, in fact, does influence societal significance. With the determination on self- esteem trajectory from adolescence to old age, self- esteem stability, and the relationship between levels of self-esteem and predictions of success and failure, one can conclude that self- esteem influences life outcomes; moreover, people can participate to involvements focused at positively influencing the development of self- esteem. In order to comprehend this article, one must have a concept of self-esteem. Self- esteem is the personal evaluation of one’s worth as a person. Most individuals subject self-esteem as the “feeling that one is ‘good enough.” Also, individuals believe those with high self- esteem tend to believe they are superior to others, which is not necessarily true. Another inaccurate assumption on self- esteem interprets that talents and abilities are influential on self-esteem. Also, self- esteem is not

Kuster and Orth examined stability patterns in self-esteem within the length of a twenty- nine-year period. In the beginning of the course of the twenty- nine years, Kuster and Orth discovered that individuals contain self- esteem stability but with a constant medium decrease of stability, which estimated as -.43, but never approached to zero stability. Then, the findings of Kuster and Orth in 2013 distinguish 70% - 85% of change was determined by trait factors, and 15% - 30% was determined by state change or error. Thus, self-esteem is determined as relatively stable and characterized as a basic of