The De Lacey Family In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1441 Words3 Pages

The De Lacey family, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, are first introduced to the monster when he observes them through a crack in the wall. Agatha, the name of the De Lacey girl, means goodness in Greek, where as her brother’s name, Felix, means happiness in Latin (CITATION?). With this, Shelley shows that the monster will develop ideas about these concepts through watching the family. From them, the monster is able to learn how to speak, to read, and most importantly, experiences social interactions for the first time, furthering the monster’s desire for companionship as well as developing him socially and psychologically. Through the De Lacey’s, their background story, and their interactions and relationship with the monster, Mary Shelley …show more content…

In “So Guided by a Silken Cord,” Adam Komisaruk explains how, as the monster watches the De Lacey family, especially once they begin teaching Safie their language, “the creature’s first lessons in western civilization are also Safie’s;” thus, the monster becomes more eloquent and gains the initial desire to become a part of their community, while establishing a connection with Safie (Komisaruk,428). From this, the De Lacey’s also function to develop the monster’s social abilities and awareness as well as provide the monster with a person to parallel to himself. Colene Bentley, in “Family, Humanity, Polity: Theorizing the Basis and Boundaries of Political Community in Frankenstein” explains, “while observing the family’s activities through a chink in the hovel wall, the creature’s critical faculties become refined” (Bentley 328). Through this …show more content…

The De Lacey’s are of low socioeconomic status, and throughout the monster’s encounter with the De Lacey family, Felix, Safie, and the monster “lament their singularity and long for companionship,” establishing “the principal task the novel sets for its characters [to be] the project of community building, that is, of specifying the basis and boundaries of shared life” (Bentley, 326). This initially demonstrates how low socioeconomic status can decrease social interactions with outsiders, thus making compassion and acceptance towards those outsiders increasingly difficult. Additionally, Shelley, as interpreted by Bentley, “develops a theory of political community,” with the story of Safie’s father and the exile of Felix and the De Lacey family. (Bentley, 326). After the betrayal, where this political community was put above human ties, the De Lacey family is increasingly likely to become deterred from accepting people outside of their family. The De Lacey's “violent aversion to the benevolent stranger in their midst suggests that an antisocial impulse is bound up with their domestic bliss;” Komisaruk theorizes, “Shelley links this tendency carefully to their socioeconomic circumstances” (Komisaruk, 432). With this, Shelley uses the De Lacey family to demonstrate how their low socioeconomic

Open Document