The Crucible Hominem Analysis

517 Words2 Pages

When Betty Parris and Ruth Putnam fall sick, Mrs. Putnam comes to visit Mr. Parris. She speaks of Ruth’s ailment by saying, “She ails as she must- she never waked this morning, but her eyes open and she walks, and hears naught, sees naught, and cannot eat. Her soul is taken, surely” (Miller 13). Miller uses a hasty generalization to set the entire play in motion. Mrs. Putnam makes the first mention of witchcraft in the play. Mrs. Putnam is suggesting that the girls are not sick, but bewitched. With this hasty generalization, friends, family, and neighbors start being accused of witchcraft, starting with Tituba in this scene. The villagers are fully willing to accuse each other of making deals with the devil. In fact, they use this to their advantage. With a neighbor hanged, their land is available to buy. The villagers make hasty generalizations because of their fear of the devil, their fear of sin, and their advantageous nature. Their belief that God damns all sinners makes them draw hasty conclusions to try to fulfill God’s work, which is taken to an extreme. …show more content…

Near the end of the play, during Elizabeth Proctor’s trial for witchcraft, Abigail Williams pretends to be bewitched. John Proctor interrupts her by calling her a whore. He then accuses Abigail of lechery, admitting to it himself (Miller 101-02). John Proctor, with his interruption of Abigail’s acting, distracted the court from the bewitching. Because he attacked Abigail by accusing her of lechery, instead of simply stating that she was acting, he is using an ad hominem argument. Miller uses this to expose Abigail’s true motives within the scene. The ad hominem argument used by Proctor also contributes to the theme of having and ulterior motive in the play by exposing Abigail’s ulterior motives, when she is seemingly doing God’s

Open Document