The Criticism Of Merleau-Ponty: The Body Of The Other

1550 Words4 Pages

Firstly, the body of the Other can be recognised as being of the same basic nature as the Individual, as an actively engaged entity. However, this is not sufficient to constitute the idea of both the Individual and Other existing in a shared world. For merleau-ponty, when the individual observes the Other, they are understood as their attitudes and projects towards the world. Meaning that when we see the Other playing a game, we see them as an individual person interacting with an object in the same way that the individual themself does themself. Merleau-Ponty explains the iea as “my world is no longer merely mine, it is no longer present only to me” (Merleau-Ponty, 2013, p. 369). Meaning that as the Individual observes the Other interacting in the world one becomes aware that one world is not wholly private and individual because here the Other is, freely interacting with the world in the same way as the Individual. Thus leading us to see that the Other not as an object, but instead as a subject.
Secondly, it is that language in entertwined with the structure of the relationship between the Individual and Other, meaning that language is integral to any relation between consciousnesses. Ones language is …show more content…

When reading Sartre's account of the Look, it seems unnatural to assume that it is the presence of the Other that causes one to feel shame, as the individual is already aware that they are doing something wrong in looking through the keyhole. Merleau-Ponty is directly critical of Sartre's ontology, wherein his Look necessitates an attitude toward human relationships which is not natural nor accurate to the reality of one's relationship to the Other, and explains instead that while one can “turn away from the social world but i cannot cease to be situated in relation to it” (Merleau-Ponty, 2013, p.

Open Document